News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:In L.A., One Way to Beat Traffic Runs into Backlash by azernik on Sunday November 15, 2015 @03:50AM (#10568971)
Apps that change their users' behavior can have massive public policy effects. Whether you think this change in traffic patterns is okay or not, it was not made with the public's interests in mind, nor with the input of democratically-elected representatives.
Re:In L.A., One Way to Beat Traffic Runs into Backlash by WildUtah on Sunday November 15, 2015 @05:24AM (#10569202)
"nor with the input of democratic..."

Really? The public and elected officials never decided to build and open public streets that everyone has a right to travel on?

A republic isn't a place where every new decision and idea requires government approval -- that's a totalitarian dictatorship. A republic is where we elect people to set and enforce the rules for us and then we work within the rules absolutely any way we please to fulfill our own individual visions without asking permission from anyone.

Re:In L.A., One Way to Beat Traffic Runs into Backlash by acdha on Sunday November 15, 2015 @07:37AM (#10569446)
What if you phrased it differently: “the roads were designed under different assumptions”?

In the past it was often assumed that most people would stay on major roads because only locals memorized chains of streets and even the people who planned routes (Thomas Brothers maps were a hallmark of the SoCal commuter, after all) would chain a few routes together but generally still kept it to what a human could remember since you couldn't safely read a map while driving.

Now that that has completely changed, it's probably true to say that the majority of local roads and traffic flows need to be reconsidered to see whether the signage or structure should change to enforce the way it was previously assumed they'd be used.

Re:In L.A., One Way to Beat Traffic Runs into Backlash by Tokala on Sunday November 15, 2015 @04:56AM (#10569125)
When's the 710 getting finished?