Re:Google self-driving car pulled over for driving too slowly
by afarrell on Friday November 13, 2015 @02:41AM
(#10558483)
Google, a subsidiary of Alphabet, was operating the car, no?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Google self-driving car pulled over for driving too slowly
by amatus on Friday November 13, 2015 @12:41PM
(#10561117)
Is BMW operating my car when I turn on cruise control?
Re:Google self-driving car pulled over for driving too slowly
by tehstone8 on Friday November 13, 2015 @12:55PM
(#10561217)
Cruise Control only regulates speed so no.
This car was engineered by people representing Google with the intent to allow it to operate completely autonomously.
Re:Google self-driving car pulled over for driving too slowly
by WildUtah on Friday November 13, 2015 @02:57AM
(#10558518)
Alphabet's Google, as we say, was operating the car. And corporations are people, my friend.
Re:Google self-driving car pulled over for driving too slowly
by bryanrasmussen on Friday November 13, 2015 @03:06AM
(#10558559)
You know Alphabet has binder full of corporations so they can always send another one over to drive the car if the police take the current driver into custody.
Re:Google self-driving car pulled over for driving too slowly
by cbd1984 on Friday November 13, 2015 @05:48AM
(#10559104)
> And corporations are people
Can we have at least one discussion forum where the notion of corporate personhood isn't abused into idiocy like this? Maybe here on a discussion board run by Y Combinator, a company with the mission of helping to create new corporations?
Re:Google self-driving car pulled over for driving too slowly
by afarrell on Friday November 13, 2015 @03:24PM
(#10562185)
I agree that in general, this quote gets brought into the discussion rather blindly. But in this specific case, I assert (without an actual legal background) that the word "person" in this law would refer to Google and that this loophole wouldn't work.