Look at Japan, Germany, the UK, and France now. They were devastated (both infrastructure and population-wise) and now they are among the strongest economies in the world, coming in behind the US and China at numbers 3,4,5,6 respectively in terms of nominal GDP.
Just as forest fires burn down old trees and put nutrients back into the soil to spur new growth, so does war force countries to rebuild and rethink.
I'm not advocating for war, but it's a much more defensible thesis in my opinion (large temporary increase in aggregate demand, large permanent decrease in labor supply), much more so than increased vacation time.
There would not be any new people. They're barely replenished with all the set of tricks you can pull.
Any soldier who falls in battle means, since wives need husbands and since it's customary to let youth fight, your nation is smaller by two. Permanently. That's what we have today, anyway.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Post%E2%80%93World_War_II_baby...
Send them all to war, half of them will come back happy to be alive.
If you're a merciless dictator, that's definitely the easiest way to make your people happy.
Only if you win, and only if nobody is actually fighting you on your soil.
The only reason the USA is such a superpower now is because literally everyone else involved had their infrastructure decimated.