News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Clojure and the technology adoption curve by dmichulke on Tuesday November 10, 2015 @09:49AM (#10539586)
Traverse a <String, Int> hashmap, remove all strings with an even key string size and sort it by the last character in the string, then add the string size to the integer (here you have a list of integers) and sum the product of the numbers at index 0 and n-1, 1 and n-2, ...

Compare the the code size in Java and Clojure.

If that is not enough, do the same thing but start with java objects (and their clojure equivalent: a hashmap) for some given object/map property.

EDIT: And if that is not enough, use as property of the object a string, defined only during run-time by a user input.

Re:Clojure and the technology adoption curve by nickbauman on Tuesday November 10, 2015 @10:04AM (#10539673)
Exactly this. The amount of code to do things is shockingly small.

When I was first learning Clojure I stumbled on a "lack of good documentation" in third party libraries. I'd google around for something that solved the problem I was trying to solve so I wouldn't reinvent the wheel. I'd find, say, a github repo that had a couple of sentences in its README that purported to solve my problem and then nothing else. What the hell, I thought; why no decent doc? Then I realized: the solution was implemented in 40 lines of Clojure. Reading the source was the fastest way to figure it out.

It still happens to me. Every time it does, I have this warm feeling of investing in something of great value.

Re:Clojure and the technology adoption curve by dmichulke on Tuesday November 10, 2015 @02:16PM (#10541627)
I also use several libraries that don't have a decent (or any) doc, just docstrings in source code and I kind of got used to it now, or, as Emacs puts it:

Code never lies, comments sometimes do (Charles de Gaulle)

Re:Clojure and the technology adoption curve by talloaktrees on Tuesday November 10, 2015 @03:52PM (#10542392)
I'd love to see some example code for doing this.

I'm trying to implement it in Kotlin and am curious how it would compare.

Re:Clojure and the technology adoption curve by dmichulke on Wednesday November 11, 2015 @04:31AM (#10545643)

  (def mymap {"asd" 1 "qwe" 2 "rtz" 3 "foo" 4 "bar" 5 "quz" 6 "bnm" 7})

  (let [ints (->> (filter (comp odd? count key)  mymap)
                                   (sort-by (comp int last first))
                                   (map (fn [[s i]]
                                          (+ (count s) i))))]
                     (reduce + 0 (map * ints (reverse ints))))
Gives me 341