News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:SETI: No Signal Detected from KIC 8462852 by maxander on Saturday November 07, 2015 @05:10PM (#10526429)
That we would receive a signal with the radio telescope discussed here would pretty much demand either that they make tremendous use of a very specific form of propulsion, or that they are putting a substantial fraction of their available energy into contacting civilizations of precisely our technological level. There's no thought that we'd pick up their radio chatter between themselves- we couldn't pick up Earth's radio noise from that distance, and we're only getting quieter as our technology becomes more effective.

Aliens in the business of contacting emerging civilizations must find themselves with an interesting tradeoff between transmitter power usage and contactee technology level- at a guess, it would be exponentially more expensive to contact species earlier on in their development. We may still just not be far along enough that the cost-benefit ratio makes sense to talk to us.

Re:SETI: No Signal Detected from KIC 8462852 by holografix on Saturday November 07, 2015 @09:42PM (#10527190)
First time I started reading about quantum computers and the idea of entangled particles I immediately thought it would be a neat way to solve long distance space Comms. Anyone with a better brain than me care to explain if it could be a possibility?
Re:SETI: No Signal Detected from KIC 8462852 by techdragon on Sunday November 08, 2015 @12:42AM (#10527663)
In short, "it doesn't work the way you think it does"

People keep digging in this area because it's hard to measure accurately so we're not 100% yet, but the current consensus is that the interaction between entangled particles, isn't faster than light and should not be faster than light.

Re:SETI: No Signal Detected from KIC 8462852 by toomuchtodo on Sunday November 08, 2015 @11:21PM (#10531367)
Do the effects of gravity move faster than light?