News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Startup Playbook by ska on Thursday November 05, 2015 @02:14PM (#10515507)
I was reacting to the definition of "lifestyle business" not the label.

I don't think passive income is needed at all, I think "lifestyle business" is a useful definition for making tradeoffs in your business decisions in favor of your lifestyle.

e.g. setting up a consulting business in a small coastal town because you like to surf every morning, even though it costs you potential business. To my mind, that's certainly a "lifestyle business".

Doing this with a product business is harder but not impossible.

Re:Startup Playbook by vonmoltke on Thursday November 05, 2015 @02:34PM (#10515636)
> I was reacting to the definition of "lifestyle business" not the label.

I don't know about you, but personally I get annoyed when people create a false dichotomy between a startup and a "lifestyle business". Not everyone who declines to play the VC game is a "lifestyle business". It should also not be a dirty word, which is the way it comes across to me sometimes.

Re:Startup Playbook by vdaniuk on Thursday November 05, 2015 @03:52PM (#10516039)
Lifestyle business is a dirty word somewhere? "Lifestyle" business is a significantly more rational choice in comparison with VC backed startup if one considers their personal happiness and psychological wellbeing as an important metric.
Re:Startup Playbook by ska on Thursday November 05, 2015 @04:50PM (#10516362)
Can't speak for poster but I suspect this is being used pejoratively in the context of "lifestyle business" == "living off passive income".
Re:Startup Playbook by vdaniuk on Thursday November 05, 2015 @05:23PM (#10516559)
That's just sad and I mean it in a non-sarcastic way.
Re:Startup Playbook by soared on Tuesday November 10, 2015 @04:04PM (#10542487)
I understood the difference to be a startup implies 60 hour weeks, a lifestyle business implies 40 or less.