News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:A lot of what we think we know about WWII is wrong by Synaesthesia on Sunday November 01, 2015 @01:41AM (#10485560)
I think the most important fallacy about WW2 is that nobody entered the war for a noble cause. It was all self-serving. It's often held up as a just war. Now of course I agree Hitler had to be defeated once 1939 came around, but it was also preventable, like most wars. The extent of appeasement was really an eye-opener to me. I'm 1937 the US state department still said Hitler was a "moderate" and should be supported! The background to the Pacific war by Noam Chomsky also tells of an economic war among empires which led directly to the Pacific war.

http://www.chomsky.info/articles/196709--.htm

The indescribable savagery of the war, particularly near the end is hard to imagine.

Lastly one of the biggest fallacies concerns Hitler's invasion of the USSR, and speculation as to whether he could have won. The truth is the Germans were incredibly fortunate to do as well as they did! In fact the USSR was a world leader in tank production and tank strategy, before the 1937 purges they had the best and most innovative tank commanders and the most advance tanks. They should have crushed the Germans from the beginning!

Re:A lot of what we think we know about WWII is wrong by whyIndeed on Sunday November 01, 2015 @01:56AM (#10485579)
I think I get what you mean, but your wording is just slightly off.

The Fallacy: That anybody was a noble actor.

Your wording makes it sound like there's a wrong-headed perception that war is not noble, and that the correction to the fallacy is to find ALL participants VERY noble, valiant and in high regard.

Then, your next sentences:

  It was all self-serving. It's often held up as a just war. 
These clarify what you meant to say, and contradict the preceeding statements.

The words "fallacy" and "nobody" inadvertently constitute a double negative.

Re:A lot of what we think we know about WWII is wrong by frozenport on Sunday November 01, 2015 @01:24AM (#10485624)
Nonsense, why did France, UK enter the war? How about Poland?
Re:A lot of what we think we know about WWII is wrong by Synaesthesia on Sunday November 01, 2015 @01:43AM (#10485651)
Well France tried to avoid confrontation and the U.K. was trying to hold on to its empire and contain the German threat, but also had many business interstate in Germany. The allies thought they could diplomatically outmaneuver Hitler.

France and the U.K. then caved to Hitler's demands repeatedly and essentially sold Czechoslovakia and Poland down the river to Hitler at Munich 1938, and during the "phoney war". France was then surprised by the swiftness of the German attack but capitulated very quickly. Her armies were still mostly intact when France fell.

It must also be remembered that the extent of collaboration in France under occupation was very great and the French resistance was always very small.

Re:A lot of what we think we know about WWII is wrong by emergentcypher on Sunday November 01, 2015 @10:33AM (#10486681)
When they realized that they were going to be right fucked. And they didn't really "enter the war" when they declared war.