Busybox removes support for systemd

Re:Busybox removes support for systemd by magila on Saturday October 31, 2015 @07:21PM (#10484658)

It's worth noting that this is a case of Linus flying off the handle based on incomplete information. It was latter revealed that the bug which caused this whole spat on LKML had already been fixed in systemd, Kay Sievers just failed to communicate that in the bug opened by Borislav Petkov.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Busybox removes support for systemd by felixgallo on Saturday October 31, 2015 @07:49PM (#10484746)

that is not at all what happened. Here's Kay Sievers, defiantly posting after in his own words after the incident: https://plus.google.com/+KaySievers/posts/3cWXzYqB6MB

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Busybox removes support for systemd by magila on Saturday October 31, 2015 @08:16PM (#10484845)

There were two different issues at play:

1. A system hang due an assertion in journald spamming kmsg.

2. The question of whether systemd should be logging to kmsg or doing anything based on the "debug" kernel command line argument.

Linus got pissed because, based on Steven Rostedt's post to LKML and the referenced bug report, it looked like Kay was refusing to fix issue #1, but that bug had already been addressed and a fix committed to systemd. In the aftermath there was also a flamewar over issue #2, which is what Lennart is responding to in that G+ post.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Busybox removes support for systemd by digi_owl on Saturday October 31, 2015 @08:37PM (#10484900)

Note that going by the Torvalds email, this is far from the first time him and Sievers has been at odds.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Busybox removes support for systemd by merb on Sunday November 01, 2015 @04:57AM (#10485972)

1. i think that assumtion is right.

I mean rate limiting stuff that comes from anywhere is needed. not cause of the fact that systemd does it. I mean if I could write a userspace tool that crashes the kernel.. is somewhat aweful.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Busybox removes support for systemd by gaius on Saturday October 31, 2015 @09:03PM (#10484970)

The fact that this is posted on Google+ and not LKML says it all really.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Busybox removes support for systemd by digi_owl on Saturday October 31, 2015 @09:21PM (#10485020)

The place have become something of a second home for a lot of Linux related devs. One potential problem with that is that the poster is free to delete any and all comments made to his posts.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Busybox removes support for systemd by dredmorbius on Saturday October 31, 2015 @09:23PM (#10485024)

NB: 404 on that link.

[ Parent | on HN ]