News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Vue.js 1.0.0. Parent comment

Re:Vue.js 1.0.0 by andrezsanchez on Tuesday October 27, 2015 @12:25AM (#10456312)
It would be neat if Facebook had implemented JSX as a framework-independent transform rather than a React-only one, that way other frameworks could use the pretty XMLish syntax rather than strings or JS objects.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Vue.js 1.0.0 by rvikmanis on Tuesday October 27, 2015 @12:29AM (#10456322)
It has: https://facebook.github.io/jsx/
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Vue.js 1.0.0 by andrezsanchez on Tuesday October 27, 2015 @02:12AM (#10456553)
Emphasis on "implemented" haha. At least this makes it more open since someone can come in and make their own implementation. As it currently stands I don't think you can use Facebook's implementation to transform JSX to a framework-agnostic object.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Vue.js 1.0.0 by dmnd on Tuesday October 27, 2015 @02:27AM (#10456589)
You can use babel. Look at the custom example here: http://babeljs.io/docs/advanced/transformers/other/react/
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Vue.js 1.0.0 by k__ on Tuesday October 27, 2015 @08:24AM (#10457523)
Well, you could fork it:

https://github.com/insin/msx

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Vue.js 1.0.0 by tiles on Tuesday October 27, 2015 @12:29AM (#10456321)
There are alternatives though, like JSX implemented in sweet.js: http://jlongster.com/Compiling-JSX-with-Sweet.js-using-Readt...
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Vue.js 1.0.0 by EvanYou on Tuesday October 27, 2015 @08:43AM (#10457595)
There are babel transforms for it: https://github.com/openjsx In fact I've seen a user use JSX-to-HTML for his Vue templates.
[ Parent | on HN ]