Re:Java 8’s new Optional type doesn't solve anything
by steveklabnik on Monday October 26, 2015 @10:10AM
(#10451514)
Yeah, I was thinking of things like array access. The stuff that's on the wrong end of the cost/benefit ratio.
We're actually in the midst of arguing whether to violate this convention and do it for RefCell: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/27733