Thanks, I was not aware of that aspect of San Francisco's history. It does not seem to have much of a connection to the present situation, though - or maybe it does? The Democrats used to be the slavery party, after all.
Is there a good source for the political history of San Francisco that does not automatically take the point of view of the current incumbents?
It's a deep history, and in interpreting it you have to be careful who you decide is "San Francisco" -- is it the institutions at the time, or the citizens who act up against it?
I agree though that it's important not to take progressive politics for granted.