News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on OpenBSD developers: Ted Unangst. Parent comment

Re:OpenBSD developers: Ted Unangst by jjoe on Sunday October 25, 2015 @06:29PM (#10448724)
Startups aside, how come OpenBSD hasn't made strides in virtualization (not counting QEMU)? Virtualization isn't a fad. Can you imagine OpenBSD as a virtualization host? I'd switch in a heart beat. Can you really justify not being virtualization-ready in 2015/2016?

I use Linux as a VM platform but I've donated to OpenBSD because I've always rooted for them. I'm just disappointed they haven't done much in this area.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:OpenBSD developers: Ted Unangst by ams6110 on Monday October 26, 2015 @12:02AM (#10449547)
You are absolutely deluded, if not stupid, if you think that a worldwide collection of software engineers who can't write operating systems or applications without security holes, can then turn around and suddenly write virtualization layers without security holes. --Theo de Raadt
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:OpenBSD developers: Ted Unangst by vezzy-fnord on Sunday October 25, 2015 @06:37PM (#10448751)
Don't move the goalposts.

That said, there is the upcoming: http://undeadly.org/cgi?action=article&sid=20150831183826

[ Parent | on HN ]