Startups aside, how come OpenBSD hasn't made strides in virtualization (not counting QEMU)? Virtualization isn't a fad. Can you imagine OpenBSD as a virtualization host? I'd switch in a heart beat. Can you really justify not being virtualization-ready in 2015/2016?
I use Linux as a VM platform but I've donated to OpenBSD because I've always rooted for them. I'm just disappointed they haven't done much in this area.
You are absolutely deluded, if not stupid, if you think that a worldwide collection of software engineers who can't write operating systems or applications without security holes, can then turn around and suddenly write virtualization layers without security holes. --Theo de Raadt
Re:OpenBSD developers: Ted Unangst
by vezzy-fnord on Sunday October 25, 2015 @06:37PM
(#10448751)
Don't move the goalposts.
That said, there is the upcoming: http://undeadly.org/cgi?action=article&sid=20150831183826
Can you really blame a project for being ahead of the curve on security? Is that really your point?