"Sort By -> Customer Rating" is a very helpful filter I usually start with.
And then you get this view:
http://www.bestbuy.com/site/searchpage.jsp?browsedCategory=a...
Lots of enormous corporations are desperately incompetent at various things; that doesn't mean it's unreasonable to ask for competence. In this case, perhaps Best Buy was very good at selling electronics before the Web became a primary way to shop for products, and never managed to make the transition effectively. It happens all the times.
You'd need to get all hands on deck, every month or so, to manually go through the whole store and look for data defects. And have them rotate who looks at which parts every time. You can't automate it, because the failure case is essentially, "It looks wrong." In theory, it's worth the effort, in practice, nobody does it.
Well, unless you're apple and you can make your own stores, but still - they sell through Best Buy too.
Certainly not an easy game, and definitely a tedious one. I know I'd hate to be on the team tasked with figuring that one out.
A similar thing happens in video games. Many developers get feedback from users and UX people that too many options are bad. THey then remove the COMPLETELY, which should not make any sense. Even a small submenu somewhere to enable advanced settings is fine, but removing them? Why?
Nobody goes out to buy an Asus router. They just go out to buy a router, and Asus can't stop them from being flooded with options. By some stroke of fate, Apple can.
So you want to buy an Asus wifi router?
http://www.bestbuy.com/site/asus/asus-routers/pcmcat29320005...
Enjoy your paralysis.