It appears there have been a lot of submissions for that site in the past, so if they're a repeat offender it would probably be easy to extract that info.
You guys probably have a treasure trove of data where you could probably extract some of the more obvious offenders pretty easily. Cross referencing submissions by specific individuals for specific domains, etc. Though I imagine there would be plenty of false positives...
Also, just a thought, I would suggest that the warning message to submitter (if they tried to submit new URLs from banned domains) would be that the site has a history of plagiarism. That way they would probably do additional work to find the original (or more original) link than the one on that site. Also that way in case a site owner wanted to object they would know the reasoning behind the ban.
I know HN has been around a long time so I am probably re-hashing some of the things you've already got in place, but figured I'd put some thoughts out there in case you guys didn't already have something in place.
Would you suggest reporting these sorts of things via email in general?
BTW, I've been going through a number of that domain's links here just a little while ago and saw most of the stories from that site are cross-posted on many other domains. It's almost as if there are so many cross-posts on some of those stories Google can't easily point me to a more "definitive" source. Instead there are just pages of links to unrecognizable domains that are all probably doing the same thing.
Url changed from http://www.net-security.org/secworld.php?id=18995. Should we ban that site?