Re:The NYPD Is Using Mobile X-Ray Vans to Spy on Unknown Tar...
by ytpete on Wednesday October 21, 2015 @03:56AM
(#10424188)
I think the poster was referring only to ionizing radiation (the kind proven to increase cancer risk). Light fixtures and heaters (infrared) don't fall into that category.
Re:The NYPD Is Using Mobile X-Ray Vans to Spy on Unknown Tar...
by vacri on Wednesday October 21, 2015 @05:52AM
(#10424482)
You are correct - I was mostly speaking for effect. But the absolutism is still a problem. For example, if you get into a car accident and are taken to an emergency department in a state where your life is in jeopardy but you are unable to provide consent - should the medical staff have the moral right to do x-rays, which greatly aid their diagnoses?
Re:The NYPD Is Using Mobile X-Ray Vans to Spy on Unknown Tar...
by CamperBob2 on Wednesday October 21, 2015 @05:09PM
(#10428723)
The medical staff had to take health physics courses and receive state certification before being allowed to use x-ray machines on humans.
The cop took physics in high school and got a 'B'. Oh, wait, no, that wasn't physics, that was physical ed.
Re:The NYPD Is Using Mobile X-Ray Vans to Spy on Unknown Tar...
by ytpete on Monday October 26, 2015 @10:48PM
(#10455958)
Also, the medical staff are irradiating you for the direct purpose of aiding you specifically. The police are irradiating you because they've decided you are by default a suspect worthy of search simply by virtue of passing by - the benefit you receive in return for any health risk is debatable at best.
So you are against public broadcasting systems? You also don't think that a government should have a moral duty to operate an emergency broadcast system for helping people deal with natural disasters? X-rays and radio waves are both EM radiation.
To be even more pedantic, this stance also means that a government building would not be able to have any lights or heaters (amongst other things). Or a cop searching for a suspect at night wouldn't be able to use a torch.
I think it's a bad, absolutist philosophical point to make.