Darwin regarded sympathy as the most important human adaptation

Re:Darwin regarded sympathy as the most important human adap... by dang on Tuesday October 20, 2015 @10:38PM (#10423338)

Whether or not the title is false, it's certainly clickbait, so we changed it to a representative sentence from the article, in accordance with the HN guidelines.

https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Darwin regarded sympathy as the most important human adap... by Hayekit on Tuesday October 20, 2015 @11:03PM (#10423427)

It's a great idea to regulate click-bait. I wonder if others find it to be click-bait though. The title represents the gist of the article. Click-bait would be a title far removed from the actual arguments or content in the article, IMO.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Darwin regarded sympathy as the most important human adap... by dang on Wednesday October 21, 2015 @01:33AM (#10423882)

It's clickbait because it uses a celebrity name to grab attention. The article contains zero factual content about Bezos.

"X got Y all wrong!" is also an intrinsically baity construct.

If you don't think the title we gave it is representative, we're always open to better ones.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Darwin regarded sympathy as the most important human adap... by Hayekit on Wednesday October 21, 2015 @09:37AM (#10425273)

Fair point. I don't know what would be a better title. How about "Does Amazon act too Darwinian in the workplace"....?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Darwin regarded sympathy as the most important human adap... by Hayekit on Wednesday October 21, 2015 @09:40AM (#10425288)

Thanks for the feedback!

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Darwin regarded sympathy as the most important human adap... by Hayekit on Tuesday October 20, 2015 @11:17PM (#10423474)

Also, isn't what you have now click-bait because it doesn't represent what the article is about?

[ Parent | on HN ]