News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:U.S. Will Require Drones to Be Registered by ctdonath on Saturday October 17, 2015 @07:13PM (#10406551)
What is registration supposed to do? Broadly, those who will register are responsible enough to not be a problem, those idiots you want to control won't register, and it all just ends up mostly harassing the wrong people. Have and enforce laws against bad behavior, yes, but stop this "guilty until proven innocent" nonsense.
Re:U.S. Will Require Drones to Be Registered by objclxt on Saturday October 17, 2015 @07:15PM (#10406558)
Would you apply the same logic to cars? Because I think all of your points apply equally to cars, but nobody seems to object to the idea of both registering them and requiring a license to drive.
Re:U.S. Will Require Drones to Be Registered by ctdonath on Saturday October 17, 2015 @07:38PM (#10406633)
Yes. Make driver education mandatory in public school. A vehicle tag should simply identify the vehicle out of a sea of mixed clones (a la: which blue Mustang?).

I actually think the U.S. Founding Fathers would have enumerated a "right to vehicular travel" if they had conceived of license-as-a-privilege restriction on horseless carriages.

Re:U.S. Will Require Drones to Be Registered by wavefunction on Saturday October 17, 2015 @09:09PM (#10406853)
>>I actually think the U.S. Founding Fathers

We'll never know though, which makes personal conjecture meaningless. And while the "Founding Fathers" may have had some singular ideas at the time, they were merely people. We could speculate what the authors of the Magna Carta might feel about drones, or the Athenian democrats as well...

Re:U.S. Will Require Drones to Be Registered by brazzledazzle on Sunday October 18, 2015 @08:49AM (#10408082)
The position the founding fathers held on freedom of movement is known based on their writings. I don't think it's too speculative to debate about which way they'd lean on the matter. That said it should be an exercise in futility since we do live in very different worlds but it isn't because the constitution's only flexibility is interpretation by federal judges.
Re:U.S. Will Require Drones to Be Registered by mikeash on Sunday October 18, 2015 @12:16AM (#10407200)
Or maybe they would have been scared completely senseless seeing tons of steel being piloted by an idiot with no training at speeds they didn't even know were possible for humans to achieve.

Either way, I couldn't care less about what people who died 200+ years ago would have thought about cars, except in an abstract "wouldn't it be cool to show George Washington a modern car and see how he reacts" sort of way.

Re:U.S. Will Require Drones to Be Registered by Hyperborian on Sunday October 18, 2015 @03:57AM (#10407546)
> Or maybe they would have been scared completely senseless seeing tons of steel being piloted by an idiot with no training at speeds they didn't even know were possible for humans to achieve.

In light of the second amendment, that seems unlikely.

Re:U.S. Will Require Drones to Be Registered by mikeash on Sunday October 18, 2015 @04:55AM (#10407638)
Automobiles are far more deadly than any 18th century firearm.
Re:U.S. Will Require Drones to Be Registered by ctdonath on Sunday October 18, 2015 @10:51AM (#10408366)
The Founding Fathers approved of personal ownership of battleships, hence the "letters of marque" clause in the constitution.
Re:U.S. Will Require Drones to Be Registered by mikeash on Sunday October 18, 2015 @11:15AM (#10408419)
Isn't a letter of marque basically a primitive license?

I think it's funny that both of these replies center on refuting my idea that they might be frightened, but ignore the more important idea that what they would or would not think is not important.

Re:U.S. Will Require Drones to Be Registered by ctdonath on Sunday October 18, 2015 @01:16PM (#10408886)
License to initiate warfare under authority of Congress, yes. License to own and operate harmlessly one defensively, no.

The philosophy of the Founding Fathers is extensively documented. Not the least of which is their carrying out revolt and secession against a superpower for the purpose of securing personal liberty and minimizing control & harassment by government. In light of that, the notion of them fearing cars and using government to restrict ownership thereof by punishing lack of paperwork is absurd.

Re:U.S. Will Require Drones to Be Registered by mikeash on Sunday October 18, 2015 @09:50PM (#10410668)
I don't think it's absurd to imagine that something so completely beyond what they could have even imagined might have hit them on a deep, irrational, emotional level.
Re:U.S. Will Require Drones to Be Registered by krasin on Saturday October 17, 2015 @07:43PM (#10406645)
>Yes. Make driver education mandatory in public school.

This is not a good time investment for children, given that not all of them will drive. Especially, considering that driverless cars are coming soon.

Re:U.S. Will Require Drones to Be Registered by ctdonath on Saturday October 17, 2015 @09:21PM (#10406875)
It's a few hours' training to teach a basic skill most of them will use (along with all the other "not all of them will use it" things they do or should learn). Those who don't formally learn will still likely end up behind a wheel anyway, documented or not - and it's those non-documented ones who are precisely the ones we particularly DO want to ensure are trained one way or another.
Re:U.S. Will Require Drones to Be Registered by tailgate on Saturday October 17, 2015 @10:19PM (#10406977)
In what universe is learning to drive a "few" hours? At minimum most courses I know of have 10-20 hours of lecture type instruction.
Re:U.S. Will Require Drones to Be Registered by Dylan16807 on Sunday October 18, 2015 @12:09AM (#10407184)
When it comes to an entire course, that's few. If you took the whole school day it would be 2-3 days. It's barely anything.
Re:U.S. Will Require Drones to Be Registered by tracker1 on Saturday October 17, 2015 @08:00PM (#10406686)
not just horseless...
Re:U.S. Will Require Drones to Be Registered by aianus on Sunday October 18, 2015 @04:58AM (#10407641)
> nobody seems to object to the idea of both registering them and requiring a license to drive.

I do. It feels so liberating not to have to do those things in countries with corrupt + ineffective policing.

Re:U.S. Will Require Drones to Be Registered by babuskov on Sunday October 18, 2015 @05:45AM (#10407708)
Then you probably wouldn't mind if someone hit you while rushing through the city at 100MPH.
Re:U.S. Will Require Drones to Be Registered by aianus on Sunday October 18, 2015 @07:29AM (#10407919)
And yet that doesn't really happen. The death rate in Vietnam per inhabitant is only 2x higher than the U.S. which is pretty much all explained by the fact that they drive motorcycles instead of cars.
Re:U.S. Will Require Drones to Be Registered by babuskov on Monday October 19, 2015 @02:36AM (#10411455)
"Only" 2x ? That's 250.000 people more. One human life is too much.
Re:U.S. Will Require Drones to Be Registered by aianus on Monday October 19, 2015 @06:10AM (#10412023)
> That's 250.000 people more.

It's 10,000 people more (in a country of 90M people) not 250,000. And, like I said, it's not due to the lax traffic laws/enforcement, it's due to the average Vietnamese riding a motorcycle instead of a car while wearing a useless brain bucket -style helmet.

> One human life is too much.

We all die anyways, might as well enjoy ourselves instead of spending all our time and money on insurance and waiting for "stop signs" and "red lights".

Re:U.S. Will Require Drones to Be Registered by Malstrond on Saturday October 17, 2015 @07:18PM (#10406569)
Only if you drive them on public roads.

So maybe not a public road -> airspace below a certain height?

Re:U.S. Will Require Drones to Be Registered by Spooky23 on Saturday October 17, 2015 @07:26PM (#10406595)
A similar concept applies to license place on road vehicles.

Sometimes some dude drives around without plates or takes an off road vehicle on the road. The police ticket the operator and tow the vehicle in some cases.

Re:U.S. Will Require Drones to Be Registered by ctdonath on Saturday October 17, 2015 @08:39PM (#10406787)
Seriously: why?
Re:U.S. Will Require Drones to Be Registered by Spooky23 on Saturday October 17, 2015 @09:17PM (#10406872)
Pretty easy.

The privilege granted by registration can be linked to other things. So when Mr. Dumbass decides to buy more beer instead of paying for insurance, and subsequently rear ends your car, you are screwed as a motorist. The requirement for registration and insurance tied to a drivers license makes the driving environment work for the vast majority of people.

The same thing applies to drones. When some jackass decides to peep into my daughter's window every day, why should that person be able to act with anonymously and with impunity?

Re:U.S. Will Require Drones to Be Registered by themartorana on Saturday October 17, 2015 @11:11PM (#10407080)
We should have a telescope and x-ocular registry! Also camera registry! That way he can't spy on your daughter "remotely" and with "impunity."
Re:U.S. Will Require Drones to Be Registered by ctdonath on Sunday October 18, 2015 @06:58AM (#10407846)
I was questioning the arrest and seizure over a mere paperwork error. Bad behavior, sure, but not for mere want of documentation.
Re:U.S. Will Require Drones to Be Registered by ekianjo on Saturday October 17, 2015 @10:49PM (#10407042)
dont forget that registration will usually come with tax.