This is the first time I've seen anyone complain about positional arguments. While I can see the point of such a complaint (and its arguably even worse in Haskell, where there's application-order confusion at the same time), my impression is that the larger body of programmers are still miffed whenever they have to explicitly name a type- explicitly handing every argument of every function to a specific named field sounds deeply onerous by comparison!

I suspect the next Holy Wars in programmer practice will revolve around "how much can we get away with not writing out?"