News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Winklevoss Twins’ Bitcoin Exchange by lemiffe on Thursday October 08, 2015 @12:11PM (#10353679)
What a beautiful, fast website.
Re:Winklevoss Twins’ Bitcoin Exchange by smoreilly on Thursday October 08, 2015 @12:17PM (#10353716)
Honestly when banks have crappy websites it makes me really feel like the engineers doing the backend work are terrible. I know this is a horrible bias but still if you can't spend the time to make a good website who says they didn't cut corners on security?
Re:Winklevoss Twins’ Bitcoin Exchange by Zelphyr on Thursday October 08, 2015 @03:01PM (#10355208)
A local Credit Union had CAPTCHA's like, "4n1m4l" and (believe it or not) "b4nK3r". When I complained they snidely remarked that they were pretty sure they knew how to handle security.

That may be, but they no longer have my money.

Though, for what its worth, the biggest reason I left them is because they wanted to charge me a fee to deposit cash that my kids had saved up. "Because that's what Loomis Fargo charges us." So? Cost of doing business.

The irony that they were CHARGING ME TO GIVE THEM MONEY was completely lost on that particular teller.

Re:Winklevoss Twins’ Bitcoin Exchange by stevenh on Thursday October 08, 2015 @08:14PM (#10357287)
It was incredibly slow here. The tab locked up the entire browser for a full 7 seconds before I could begin scrolling. The rendering frame rate of scrolling was 3-4 FPS, and only jumped back up to a fluid rate once I scrolled down past all of the images. Late 2013 MacBook Pro running Chrome.
Re:Winklevoss Twins’ Bitcoin Exchange by heyheyhey on Thursday October 08, 2015 @05:55PM (#10356596)