I'd built a device with an MSP430 and have been meaning to try CamelForth on it instead of using my own C code.
I'd be curious to try something else for easier testing at a higher level or even figure out how to run the 8086 in a virtual machine..
>> but GForth, the only accessible Forth, looks a bit unloved.
With something as stable as Forth, I'm not sure what kind of activity would indicate a project is active enough unless it is adapting to new or highly unstable architectures?
Re:The “8th” Programming Language
by i_feel_great on Wednesday October 07, 2015 @07:23AM
(#10345340)
The last time I had a serious look at GForth, it lacked libraries that I needed for my own development needs at the time: http-client, sqlite/postgres, xml/json, gui etc. It only seemed to cater just to embedded folks. Pity, I actually like the way development is done in Forth.
Re:The “8th” Programming Language
by sarciszewski on Wednesday October 07, 2015 @05:36AM
(#10345009)
> Not open source
Deal-breaker for me.
Re:The “8th” Programming Language
by neuromancer85 on Wednesday October 07, 2015 @06:01AM
(#10345080)
From the faq (http://8th-dev.com/faq.html):
q) Are there any restrictions on who can use 8th?
a) Yes. Due to Israeli export laws, residents of the following countries may neither use nor purchase 8th: Cuba, Iran, Iraq, Lebanon, Libya, North Korea, Palestinian Authority, Sudan, and Syria.
WTF! This is the very deal-breaker for me...
Either if these are dealbreakers for me but this crap is just weird. Is that more common; last week we had that German bigot with his scientific software and now this...
Re:The “8th” Programming Language
by wodenokoto on Wednesday October 07, 2015 @10:31AM
(#10346219)
I think there's a big difference between being restricted by national laws and deciding to personally exclude countries.
But this thing looks rather good. Not open source, but for what it does, $199/year isn't bad.
Edit: $199/year for the commercial version. Non-commercial is free.