Re:Why can't we get rid of taxi medallions? (2012)
by Retric on Tuesday October 06, 2015 @10:37AM
(#10339151)
Medallions are a productive asset, so 5.3 billion is somewhat disingenuous.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Why can't we get rid of taxi medallions? (2012)
by mathgeek on Tuesday October 06, 2015 @11:49AM
(#10339682)
Wouldn't the current and future production be factored into the price, though? I'd have to guess that 5.3 billion is a low estimate for actual losses if you owned one of these in 2011 and still hold it.
Re:Why can't we get rid of taxi medallions? (2012)
by Retric on Tuesday October 06, 2015 @12:02PM
(#10339841)
Your double counting the returns as future cash flows are already factored into the sale price.
Suppose you had a bond worth 2$ that paid out 1$ and is now worth 1$. That's not a paper loss of 1$.
PS: At the last auction, in 2008, the opening bid was $189,000, and medallions sold for as little as $226,000. http://www.thenewyorkworld.com/2014/01/20/taxi-medallions/
In total, TLC will be auctioning off 2,000 new medallions, 40 percent of them to drivers. (January 20, 2014) that's a significant part of the price drop.
Re:Why can't we get rid of taxi medallions? (2012)
by mathgeek on Thursday October 08, 2015 @07:49PM
(#10357193)
I was speaking more to the loss of future earnings because of the lower demand for traditional taxis. Any earnings you do get out of ownership are already calculated into the value of the medallion, so not only are you losing the difference in value but also the earnings that it enable you to receive (but you'll no longer get even though you spent the original price expecting them).