FWIW, violent overthrow of other people is normal human behavior, as is violent (ideally armed) resistance to same. It may be distasteful to a sunflower with such delicate sensibilities, but that doesn't make it go away.

As for my supposed 'privilege', whose accomplishments are so ideologically pure that you can't trot out that old chestnut? Do I have to be a gay black irish trans jew to be able to take pride in anything I've achieved, or is there some other marginalized minority who is even more downtrodden that I should aspire to, if I want my accomplishments to mean anything to the workaday SJW?

The fact that GP operates from a position of extreme privilege, doesn't mean that what he says is not true or invalid.

To the question of whether something is wrong, it being "normal human behavior" is not an argument for or against.

Normal doesn't mean fair or right or harmless or good. That's what the article is about.

So why did he say it?

Fair is meaningless in context of culture exchange. So is right. Harmless - in the majority of the cases it is. So is with good.

A person whining against somebody using "his" culture, blindly ignores the fact that "his" culture is crossbreed that is constantly changing and evolving.

Should we all pretend that "fair is meaningless in context of culture exchange" is a reasonable thing to say now?