Re:Apple CEO Tim Cook: 'Privacy Is a Fundamental Human Right'
by johncolanduoni on Thursday October 01, 2015 @11:23PM
(#10316556)
> What? You must mean something else because unlocked devices aren't (necessarily) compromised.
I mean compromised in the sense that the malicious party now (for example) has access to the user's email, and would be able to reset a whole host of passwords for online services (assuming they don't use 2FA or something similar, which most users don't). If they wanted to install a keylogger, or get saved passwords, then yes they still have to jailbreak my device. This xkcd is relevant: https://xkcd.com/1200/
Re:Apple CEO Tim Cook: 'Privacy Is a Fundamental Human Right'
by glhaynes on Thursday October 01, 2015 @11:35PM
(#10316588)
I think we must be using "unlocked" in different ways. I'm intending it in what I think is the conventional way for this context: when the device's cellular subsystem is not electronically locked to a particular cellular service provider.
Re:Apple CEO Tim Cook: 'Privacy Is a Fundamental Human Right'
by johncolanduoni on Thursday October 01, 2015 @11:40PM
(#10316604)
You're absolutely right, I should've picked a different word. I mean unlocked in the lock-screen/password sense. Of course, messing with carrier settings is not easily done even if the phone is not carrier-locked, and pulling of an exploit that way is even more difficult.
What? You must mean something else because unlocked devices aren't (necessarily) compromised.