News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on US Court of Appeals Takes on Ridesharing in Aviation. Parent comment

Re:US Court of Appeals Takes on Ridesharing in Aviation by ksherlock on Tuesday September 29, 2015 @08:24PM (#10300877)
> The only legitimate (IMO) concern that the FAA has in this is that there will be some people who will try to operate their own little mini-illegal charter service.

You just described flytenow.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:US Court of Appeals Takes on Ridesharing in Aviation by fnordfnordfnord on Tuesday September 29, 2015 @09:18PM (#10301088)
Maybe, a little. When I look at Flytenow, I don't get the "we're mis-representing what we're selling" vibe. When I think "fly by night", I mainly think, uninsured.

Charter Flight Service: We have ATP rated pilots who will take you in our aircraft which are inspected and maintained per FAR Part 135 (at least as well as anyone else is); including carrying the right amount of insurance.

Flytenow: A brokering service for some dudes who have their own airplanes and will take you along for a ride if your schedules and destinations intersect, and if you pitch in a few bucks. Also probably has a bit of insurance, though I couldn't begin to imagine how they'd get it.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:US Court of Appeals Takes on Ridesharing in Aviation by ksherlock on Wednesday September 30, 2015 @09:04AM (#10303570)
Most likely the plane is a rental. Rental costs can be split but if you own the plane, you cannot split maintenance, insurance, etc.
[ Parent | on HN ]