News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:US Court of Appeals Takes on Ridesharing in Aviation by smcg on Tuesday September 29, 2015 @05:44PM (#10299937)
Could someone give a quick summary of flightsharing and how this ruling affects it?
Re:US Court of Appeals Takes on Ridesharing in Aviation by lisper on Tuesday September 29, 2015 @06:02PM (#10300083)
This isn't a ruling, it was a hearing that will eventually lead to a ruling.

What this is about is that the FARs prohibit private pilots from flying passengers "for hire" but allow them to "share expenses." There are a number of tests to determine whether a private pilot who takes money from passengers is flying "for hire" or merely "sharing expenses" and one of them is the so-called "holding-out" rule: if you advertise your willingness to take passengers, then you are presumed to be flying for hire and you need (at least) a commercial license. Advertising on Flightshare is considered "holding out" by the FAA.

(I'm a private pilot.)

Re:US Court of Appeals Takes on Ridesharing in Aviation by superuser2 on Tuesday September 29, 2015 @06:01PM (#10300074)
Not remotely an expert, but the basic idea is that hobbyist pilots are licensed to fly for their personal entertainment/transportation only.

They are not licensed as airlines, so selling tickets at a profit is a definite no-no. But they can take their friends along for the ride and split the cost of fuel.

A number of apps/websites have popped up that blur the line between "operating an illegal airline" and "doing the equivalent of a carpool in a Cessna." That's the gray area that needs to be fleshed out.