News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:A New Face for Pebble by mooogs on Wednesday September 23, 2015 @02:19PM (#10266898)
Same price as the Moto 360 with half the features and twice the bezel on top.
Re:A New Face for Pebble by djrogers on Wednesday September 23, 2015 @02:43PM (#10267093)
And about 1/5th of the "I've strapped a toy can of dog food on my wrist" from the 360's thickness...
Re:A New Face for Pebble by Someone1234 on Wednesday September 23, 2015 @03:06PM (#10267322)
What's interesting to me, is that people are starting to forget how thick mechanical watches were.

Here's a Rolex[0] (Sea-Dweller 4000). Here's a Moto 360[1].

And now instead of holding eWatches to the same standard as mechanicals, it has turned into another thickness race.

[0] https://imgur.com/TVroPQp [1] https://imgur.com/Vbve1pq

Re:A New Face for Pebble by anthonybsd on Wednesday September 23, 2015 @06:25PM (#10268680)
You picked a horrible example. Rolex Sea Dweller is amongst the thickest of dive watches because it's designed to be taken to extreme depths (depths no human will ever descend to in a diving suit).

Here's Piaget Altiplano for example: http://blog.luxurybazaar.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/02/Piag...

or

Blancpain Billeret https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/236x/62/39/fa/6239fae47...

Re:A New Face for Pebble by micampe on Wednesday September 23, 2015 @07:55PM (#10269067)
Well, that’s true, but you went to the other extreme of the spectrum: Piaget’s specialty are ultra thin watches, I don’t think it’s a much better example.

Mechanical watches under 7mm are already considered thin; more usually they are 9-11mm. Quartz are easily thinner.

I think smartwatches currently around look thicker because of case and lugs design. For example, the Sea-Dweller is 18mm, but the side of the case is not flat all the way like the 360, the case back is actually inset, so it’s less noticeable.

Re:A New Face for Pebble by chockablock on Wednesday September 23, 2015 @03:45PM (#10267625)
I'm not choosing between a Rolex and a smartwatch; I'm choosing between a smartwatch and nothing.
Re:A New Face for Pebble by ricardobeat on Wednesday September 23, 2015 @06:11PM (#10268605)
The 360 is visibly larger and taller in the picture, and the strap ending at the bottom doesn't really help.
Re:A New Face for Pebble by mooogs on Wednesday September 23, 2015 @06:30PM (#10268692)
Sure, it looks thick if you have skinny wrists. I love the bold look.
Re:A New Face for Pebble by 542458 on Wednesday September 23, 2015 @02:38PM (#10267060)
EDIT: My post is wrong, see replies.

IMHO it has one killer feature the Moto 360 doesn't - e-ink (which brings with it always-on display, bright-light readability and power savings benefits). For that reason alone I'd be way more likely to pick up one of these than a 360. I also like the design a lot more (huge bezel and all), but that's even more subjective.

Re:A New Face for Pebble by blackguardx on Wednesday September 23, 2015 @02:43PM (#10267097)
It doesn't use e-ink. It uses a Sharp Memory LCD (http://www.sharpmemorylcd.com). I think Pebble calls it e-paper because they promised e-ink in their first kickstarter but were unable to deliver on that. No one else calls it that. I assume a custom e-ink display was too expensive. The first Pebble used the same display as one of the early Nike watches, which made it a lot cheaper.
Re:A New Face for Pebble by oniony on Wednesday September 23, 2015 @02:51PM (#10267168)
The original Pebble uses a Sharp LCD. The Pebble Time uses JDI display. I have no idea what display the Time Round uses: do you know for sure it's a Sharp unit?
Re:A New Face for Pebble by blackguardx on Wednesday September 23, 2015 @09:44PM (#10269394)
I'm not positive they still use the Sharp brand, but I'm pretty sure the display technology is the same: LCD backed by SRAM in the display. You don't need to continuously update the display. Once you write a frame or part of a frame, the processor can go to sleep.
Re:A New Face for Pebble by 542458 on Wednesday September 23, 2015 @02:48PM (#10267137)
Well, TIL. My bad! And I just checked the battery life - only two days? Ugh. Guess I'll be holding off on smartwatches for a while yet still.
Re:A New Face for Pebble by cweagans on Wednesday September 23, 2015 @03:00PM (#10267248)
FWIW, I have the Pebble Time Steel from Kickstarter earlier this year and I get a good 4-6 days of battery life on a single charge.
Re:A New Face for Pebble by kylec on Thursday September 24, 2015 @01:20AM (#10269973)
Given that they claim 10 days of battery life for the Steel, maybe we should expect the Round, which has a claimed two-day battery life, to only get one.
Re:A New Face for Pebble by quotedmycode on Wednesday September 23, 2015 @02:49PM (#10267153)
The "2 days" battery life makes me reconsider. The Moto 360v2 can get nearly the same (not in ambient mode), but it has a better screen that you can even see in the dark... The only reason I would want to get a pebble vs the moto is that it has a longer battery life (a week or so?), but this thing gets only slightly better battery life, yet costs nearly the same, eh, to me it's just not worth it.
Re:A New Face for Pebble by untog on Wednesday September 23, 2015 @02:47PM (#10267130)
But a lot thinner and presumably a far better battery life.

I'm not going to get the Pebble Round, but I'd be far more willing to strap one to my wrist than I would the Moto 360 monstrosity.

Re:A New Face for Pebble by mooogs on Wednesday September 23, 2015 @06:33PM (#10268703)
I never had a problem charging a smartwatch while I sleep every night. Personally sleeping with a watch is uncomfortable . The battery life selling point is pretty weak, considering that you still need to be tied to a phone with a shorter battery life in order to receive notifications.
Re:A New Face for Pebble by alexland on Wednesday September 23, 2015 @05:50PM (#10268499)
And twice the battery life (more if you run the 360 in Ambient Mode, which the Pebble does inherently) and half the thickness!