Re:Free parking isn’t free: Parking mandates hurt America’s ...
by jacobolus on Saturday September 19, 2015 @12:36PM
(#10244721)
What? Matthew Yglesias is not “libertarianish” by any stretch of the imagination, and does not claim anything of the sort. He states outright that the goal is to reduce the extremely expensive (in land, money, etc.) parking subsidy that we currently provide to cars, which obviously makes cars more difficult to own.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Free parking isn’t free: Parking mandates hurt America’s ...
by Natsu on Saturday September 19, 2015 @02:24PM
(#10245100)
I wonder what their response will be when low income people are the hardest hit by the lack of well-developed public transport? "Sucks to be you?" is what it's sounding like, but I hope that's wrong.
Re:Free parking isn’t free: Parking mandates hurt America’s ...
by jacobolus on Saturday September 19, 2015 @08:45PM
(#10246119)
Yglesias argues for guaranteed basic income, http://www.slate.com/blogs/moneybox/2013/02/17/guaranteed_ba...
But he also argues for increased spending on public transit, universal healthcare, more worker-friendly labor laws, and so on.