Re:Interpretations of quantum theory: A map of madness
by pharrington on Thursday September 17, 2015 @12:27PM
(#10234323)
some words for whom Feynman's imperative is not enough:
A paradox is just a scenario that betrays the subject's lack of, or inappropriate, context. They are a perceptual phenomenon. Indeed, language and imagery will not explain QM and there is no problem with that. The only philosophy required is that which understands that different tools are needed to work appropriately with different layers of complexity and scale; the proven appropriate tool for the apparently most basic layer is math.
A paradox is just a scenario that betrays the subject's lack of, or inappropriate, context. They are a perceptual phenomenon. Indeed, language and imagery will not explain QM and there is no problem with that. The only philosophy required is that which understands that different tools are needed to work appropriately with different layers of complexity and scale; the proven appropriate tool for the apparently most basic layer is math.