The HTTP/2 test does exactly what it's designed to do: opens a lot of connections and receives the images pretty much all at once.
This isn't to downplay HTTP/2, but it's something that should be noted for _this_ test.
I believe that HTTP/2 isn't opening many connections. It's opening one TCP connection and multiplexing many requests through that. This would allow for exploiting a pre-warmed TCP connection in subsequent requests. I've always felt that was a flaw in HTTP/2: with minor modifications, that multiplexing protocol could have been split out.
I'm interested to see how HTTP/2 could accelerate your modern jumbo media websites. The ones with a dozen or so tracking bugs, ads, etc. All splattered across multiple domains with ad servers that aren't quite as zippy as one would wish.
I'd like to know more about how this benchmark runs and what it's actually measuring. Page load times and responsiveness are notoriously hard to define.
I don't mean to nitpick the benchmark too much, it's obviously measuring something, but it's also nice to be able to weigh it against other tests and design goals.