Go GC: Prioritizing low latency and simplicity

Re:Go GC: Prioritizing low latency and simplicity by rancur on Monday August 31, 2015 @11:41PM (#10150597)

> potentially dangerous worldview

those tools are the same freaks that make Chrome take 150MB-200MB per Tab and ruined my perfectly usable 8GB-RAM system in a matter of 2 years.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Go GC: Prioritizing low latency and simplicity by clessg on Tuesday September 01, 2015 @12:22AM (#10150719)

You may enjoy this: https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/the-great-suspende...

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Go GC: Prioritizing low latency and simplicity by tmd83 on Tuesday September 01, 2015 @03:28AM (#10151148)

How reliable is this one? Browsers these days are infuriatingly memory hog and Chrome is the champion specially in OSX.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Go GC: Prioritizing low latency and simplicity by clessg on Tuesday September 01, 2015 @03:37AM (#10151174)

I haven't had any problems with it. As somebody who has ~100 tabs open at any given time, this extension is a godsend.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Go GC: Prioritizing low latency and simplicity by rancur on Tuesday September 01, 2015 @03:27PM (#10155049)

you know, considering I manage with 300GB / month I don't see why I should need 200MB for each website. Just keep it serialized and compressed until I need it.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Go GC: Prioritizing low latency and simplicity by rancur on Tuesday September 01, 2015 @12:55AM (#10150792)

it's too late. I have 32GB now

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Go GC: Prioritizing low latency and simplicity by rhudson on Tuesday September 01, 2015 @08:52AM (#10151963)

That pretty much validates their motivation.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Go GC: Prioritizing low latency and simplicity by rancur on Tuesday September 08, 2015 @10:36PM (#10189363)

haha. sigh...

[ Parent | on HN ]