clessg
QuickBEAM: JavaScript Runtime for the BEAM VM
Kaplay.js: The fun and open source game library for HTML5 Games
Elixir Language Tour
BoldPixels: A free pixel art font
Phoenix LiveView 1.1 Released
Mexican Navy Ship Crashes into New York City's Brooklyn Bridge
Popcorn: Run Elixir in WASM
Trinitite
Tracking the Ancestry of Corn Back 9k Years (2010)
Canadian detained for 11 days by U.S. speaks out for others stuck in limbo
I just so happen to run an old online fan made Pokemon game where people can be banned for misbehavior (e.g. cheating). Let's just say I can confirm this sentiment.
> The removal procedure for presidentially appointed IGs is found in Title 5, Section 403(b), which reads in part An Inspector General may be removed from office by the President. If an Inspector General is removed from office or is transferred to another position or location within an establishment, the President shall communicate in writing the substantive rationale, including detailed and case-specific reasons for any such removal or transfer to both Houses of Congress (including the appropriate congressional committees), not later than 30 days before the removal or transfer. Nothing in this subsection shall prohibit a personnel action otherwise authorized by law, other than transfer or removal.
So it's illegal because he didn't notify Congress in advance. That statute was enacted in 2022 specifically to prevent abuses of power such as this.
Fair enough, I strongly hope a good number of folks within the government show a backbone and resist unlawful or abusive orders however they can. Unfortunately those same people can easily be fired and replaced with somebody appropriately loyal (as is already happening). So, unfortunately, I'm not terribly optimistic.
Popular backlash seems to be fairly effective so far at least, so there is some hope. (For example the federal funding freeze which ended almost immediately after a flurry of confusion and outrage. Allegedly ended, anyway - it's not exactly clear in reality.)
Besides, even if they did have the power to enforce the law, I can't say I exactly trust the Supreme Court to even try reining in Trump (except in minor ways) based on their recent track record. But who knows.
AI GPU Clusters, from Your Laptop, with Livebook
9/11 in Realtime
LiveView Native Is Here
Boeing Starliner, leaving its crew behind, lands in New Mexico
Scaling Your Phoenix App in Elixir with Flame
In lawsuit, Logan Paul argues Coffeezilla defamed him with CryptoZoo criticism
LiveView Is Not a Zero-JS Framework, It's a Zero-Boring-JS Framework
Elixir 1.17 released: set-theoretic types in patterns, durations, OTP 27
Implementing MVCC and major SQL transaction isolation levels
Web apps have client and server state
> By the way, the official Elixir website recommends using Homebrew to install it. But almost everyone in the Github issues and comments says ASDF is the way to go.
The Elixir website is right. Just use Homebrew until you find a real need for asdf or similar tools. It's far simpler.
asdf (or mise[0]) is merely a way to manage different runtime versions between various projects, you would use it the same way as one might use rbenv/rvm, nvm/n, pyenv, or even Docker/nix, and so on. You don't need it until you have several ongoing projects requiring different runtime versions. If you reach that point, great! It'll be worth the effort then, and it isn't difficult.
Personally, I just use Homebrew Elixir for easy ad-hoc access to iex/livebook. If I truly need reproducible environments, devbox[1] (a sort of nix wrapper) is nice and extremely straightforward.
Tl;dr: Just use Homebrew. If your requirements expand beyond that, you probably have far more challenging problems than installing asdf (or whatever).