News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Distributed Ledgers Part I: Bitcoin is dead by jsprogrammer on Saturday August 29, 2015 @11:59AM (#10140410)
Aren't miners middlemen? And don't they take a toll?
Re:Distributed Ledgers Part I: Bitcoin is dead by brighton36 on Saturday August 29, 2015 @12:07PM (#10140437)
I don't agree with most/all of ilaksh's points. But it is worth noting that miners are 100% fungible, which reduces their ability to extract economic rent in the process. In effect "being a middleman" has been rendered a substitutable commodity.
Re:Distributed Ledgers Part I: Bitcoin is dead by _red on Saturday August 29, 2015 @12:11PM (#10140449)
Without miners there would be no certification of the blockchain. This is pretty much the central point of the technology.

Calling them middlemen couldn't be more wrongheaded.

Its like calling farmers "middlemen" because after all the sun / seeds ultimately grow the plant.

Re:Distributed Ledgers Part I: Bitcoin is dead by dragontamer on Saturday August 29, 2015 @12:07PM (#10140438)
The other middlemen are the hoarders. If BTC inflates in value, then the hoarders will benefit.

BTC obscures the middlemen. It doesn't remove them.

Re:Distributed Ledgers Part I: Bitcoin is dead by ypcx on Saturday August 29, 2015 @12:13PM (#10140455)
Miners produce actual value by processing transactions and generating new coins. So they are more like base-men.