If you're tolerant of everything, including intolerance, you end up supporting intolerance.
Or, in short, it's perfectly fine to kick people out for being hateful. There's no inconsistency or hypocrisy in that position.
The response is not unique to Mozilla. Big companies like Google have probably encountered similar situations. Mozilla is just more open about it.
I don't know where you got that "she was a well known bully of a supervisor and a source of stress for everyone under her" but that doesn't match anything I've heard about Christie. Look at this guy comment history on reddit ( https://www.reddit.com/user/aoiyama), and maybe you'll change your mind.
Then, slowly, the hackers became engineers. The hackers' way of thinking, in many ways, became society's way of thinking, and it was easy enough not to express contrary political opinions. At which point it became easy not to express any at all.
I am an engineer, and what's a "manifesto"? Damn kids, dragging politics into our professional industry... they're all alike.
No, just reactionary and hypocritical. You can't avoid politics, it's present in any social setting, and in any decision you make that affects others, particularly large groups of people (such as - Mozilla users). By shutting out debate, all you're doing is enforcing the political status quo.
Yes there are work environments that deserve abundant politics, rebellion & real resolutions. But most people aren't working in Vietnamese sweatshops or diamond mines in the C.A.R.
“There is nothing that is not political. Everything is politics.”It may be in many places & affect many things but it does not encompass everything. Absolutists are always wrong eventually (no matter how satisfying the quote is).