The soldiers bought stuff (or were preyed upon) by various camp followers selling more stuff.
Generally speaking, the South had a weak supply chain, so they were more often to go without. I think that fact spoke more to the eventual Union victory.... industrial economies can absorb more punishment than a agrarian slave economy.
Your comment also ignores phytonutrients* (which includes flavonoids and some anti-oxidants) and the effects of diet on gut flora, both of which topics we are just beginning to understand.
This is why, until we really understand the nitty-gritty of all of the hundreds (thousands?) of chemicals contained in food and how they interact, the best recommendations involve eating a variety of foods, both fresh and cooked.
* http://extension.psu.edu/health/news/2012/the-importance-of-...
That being said, it's still advisable to check for deficits, of course.
Not really - lentils, beans, peas, seeds, nuts, tofu and tempeh are all good sources of protein.
The Union soldiers wore blue. The Confederate soldiers wore grey. The Union won. The conclusion is obvious.
So what I'd really like to know is what happens with
plus Maybe that's most of what's needed? The article does mention supplements, but only piecemeal.Of course, people still need protein. You won't get that from a cheap vitamin pill, and it's tricky to do right with a vegan diet. Fortunately I live in the USA and beef is relatively cheap. "Beef. It's what's for dinner".
BTW I have vague recall of Northern vs Southern diets in the US Civil War. The claim was that this played an important part in the health and strength of the soldiers. The Union soldiers had more beef and wheat in their diets. The Confederate soldiers had more pork and corn. The Union won.