Re:Gene Therapy Makes Near-Blind Patients See by Strengtheni...
by frozenport on Wednesday August 12, 2015 @05:06PM
(#10050615)
>>It don't know what it means for biology to be less mathematically difficult
It means that wet lab biology can be learned after a few years of work, making professors less valuable as a source of knowledge.
>>grad-level quantum chemistry I would be suprised if the guys running the elisa have more than second semester calculus. Certainly not a requirement for undergrads at our school.
Re:Gene Therapy Makes Near-Blind Patients See by Strengtheni...
by dekhn on Wednesday August 12, 2015 @07:11PM
(#10051367)
You're talking about technical work, not biology. The same applies to any number of other domains. Sounds to me like you just have a chip on your shoulder.
Re:Gene Therapy Makes Near-Blind Patients See by Strengtheni...
by frozenport on Wednesday August 12, 2015 @11:55PM
(#10052176)
>>You're talking about technical work, not biology.
Well, people get PhD for it. Tell them its not biology :-)
>>just have a chip on your shoulder
Yeah, I blame the academic system
Re:Gene Therapy Makes Near-Blind Patients See by Strengtheni...
by dekhn on Thursday August 13, 2015 @08:12AM
(#10053525)
Nobody gets a PhD for doing lab work. People get PhDs for publishing papers and they do lab work because there isn't enough grant money or capable techs for doing really hard experiments.
You can't make the same amount of money just teaching classes- professors have to bring in money to pay their summer salaries.
Note, also, that the general trend in universities has been to move away from full professorships- while the tenure program is great, it reduces the freedom of the administration when it comes to dealing with low performers (I'm not making a value judgement, just an observation).
It don't know what it means for biology to be less mathematically difficult (I'm a biophysicist by training and I assure you the math is pretty hard, especially when you get into grad-level quantum chemistry).