Re:DigitalOcean Teams Up with Bitnami, Install Over 100 Web ...
by kuschku on Tuesday August 11, 2015 @05:04PM
(#10044374)
The 2$ OVH plan works better than the 10$ DO plan, if you can live without the ecosystem and with a quite meh webinterface.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:DigitalOcean Teams Up with Bitnami, Install Over 100 Web ...
by nly on Tuesday August 11, 2015 @06:30PM
(#10044849)
RunAbove 'Sandbox' instances overcommit RAM and provide no SLA. Sure, you can't beat the price, but if I wasn't interested in a SLA then I'd rather pay $10 and get a Kimsufi.
Re:DigitalOcean Teams Up with Bitnami, Install Over 100 Web ...
by kuschku on Tuesday August 11, 2015 @07:07PM
(#10045003)
Kimsufi just resells OVH’s Dedicated Servers.
But, sure, you get exactly what you ask for.
On the other hand, I never had an issue with my OVH 2$ (now 5$) server, and I run an Apache with worpress, an IRC bouncer for a handful of users, a mumble, a teamspeak and a minecraft server on it. Less than 100% CPU and RAM utilization.
OVH isn’t cheap because they don’t deliver the performance you ask for, OVH is cheap because they really don’t provide anything else in the free tier, no backups, no additional IPs, no guarantueed uptime.