News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Assange, the law of limitation, and the next eight days by gadders on Tuesday August 11, 2015 @09:18AM (#10040765)
It does seem unbelievable that you can in essence go on the lam for five years and then you're free to carry on your life as before.
Re:Assange, the law of limitation, and the next eight days by Zenst on Tuesday August 11, 2015 @09:29AM (#10040862)
Agreed and very much a case of using the letter of the law to abuse the spirit of the law and in this case, avoid it.

He has argued all along that if he left he would be whisked away for nefarious trials by America and if that was the case then this 5 year date of his hiding will make no difference. Unless he just wanted to avoid the trial for whatever reason.

Still for a trial you need a victim and in this case, that victim was not Assange and we have a trial and victim who will not see justice or any form of trial - fair or not. So can imagine how they feel about this.

Re:Assange, the law of limitation, and the next eight days by gadders on Tuesday August 11, 2015 @09:34AM (#10040899)
Even if we leave aside the specifics of the Assange case, I still find it astonishing as a general principle.
Re:Assange, the law of limitation, and the next eight days by kiiski on Tuesday August 11, 2015 @10:19AM (#10041216)
Is five years evading law enforcement really that much better than ~1 year in prison? (One year based on the fact that the five year limit only applies if the maximum penalty is at most 2 years[1], and presumably a first timer would not spend the whole 2 years in prison (and the actual sentence in this case might be below 2 years anyway))

The general principle, as far as I know, is based on the idea that the need for punishment is lessened by time.

[1] https://sv.wikipedia.org/wiki/Preskription#Preskriptionstide...

Re:Assange, the law of limitation, and the next eight days by draugadrotten on Tuesday August 11, 2015 @10:34AM (#10041332)
> Is five years evading law enforcement really that much better than ~1 year in prison?

No, clearly not, especially considering the circumstances of the evasion is similar to a Swedish prison. He probably doesn't have a playstation in the Embassy, but he could have had one in his prison cell.

The only reason Assange submitted himself to being locked up into the embassy for 5 years is because he truly fears extradition to the US. In my opinion, rightly so. Remember Sweden allowed secret CIA extraordinary rendition, aka torture flights only a few years before the Assange event[1].

[1] http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/05...

Re:Assange, the law of limitation, and the next eight days by Tomte on Tuesday August 11, 2015 @10:38AM (#10041356)
You don't truly believe that the UK, being "cousins" and with all the "special relationship", would be a less probable actor to allow this dreaded extraordinary rendition, do you?
Re:Assange, the law of limitation, and the next eight days by Zenst on Tuesday August 11, 2015 @09:40AM (#10040937)
More so when if this was TAX evasion then Sweden have no time limit, which is really putting how messed up this is into perspective.