Re:Why shooting to wound doesn't make sense scientifically, ...
by mirimir on Thursday August 06, 2015 @03:33PM
(#10018823)
Maybe what's needed are better non-lethal weapons for police.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Why shooting to wound doesn't make sense scientifically, ...
by mkirlin on Thursday August 06, 2015 @04:00PM
(#10018999)
Or better training and actual accountability. It's not like cops use tasers judiciously and intelligently.
Re:Why shooting to wound doesn't make sense scientifically, ...
by mirimir on Thursday August 06, 2015 @04:09PM
(#10019083)
Tasers are not all that non-lethal :(
Police ought to be part of the community, rather than some external paramilitary force. Their behavior would then be modulated through social mechanisms.
Re:Why shooting to wound doesn't make sense scientifically, ...
by mkirlin on Thursday August 06, 2015 @04:15PM
(#10019116)
Also an excellent point. The selling of non-lethal weapons has been a several-decades long exercise in manufacturers lying about the safety of those non-lethal weapons. Rubber bullets, tasers, it's all bullshit.
Re:Why shooting to wound doesn't make sense scientifically, ...
by noblethrasher on Thursday August 06, 2015 @03:47PM
(#10018908)
Possibly.
But, another name for “non-lethal weapon” is “cheap and effective compliance tool”.
With those, we risk making many forms of protest and civil disobedience difficult or impossible.
Re:Why shooting to wound doesn't make sense scientifically, ...
by mirimir on Thursday August 06, 2015 @04:12PM
(#10019096)
That's not an issue, as long as police act lawfully, and laws allow protest and civil disobedience.
Re:Why shooting to wound doesn't make sense scientifically, ...
by PythonicAlpha on Thursday August 06, 2015 @04:16PM
(#10019124)
> as long as police act lawfully
I knew, there is a glitch!
Re:Why shooting to wound doesn't make sense scientifically, ...
by thedoctor79 on Thursday August 06, 2015 @04:05PM
(#10019045)
How about using electro-magnetic waves to alter the brain function temporarily and provoke it to lose consciousness? Sounds like a hard technical challenge, but we can already deliver effective tranquilisants remotely and use electrical discharge to disable the central nervous system. Just find a more efficient way of doing that.
Re:Why shooting to wound doesn't make sense scientifically, ...
by bluedino on Thursday August 06, 2015 @04:36PM
(#10019259)
Ideally you would want some kind of sci-fi weapon that shoots out some sort of impenetrable web/blanket that wraps around the criminal, holding them until you can safely handle them at a later point.
Re:Why shooting to wound doesn't make sense scientifically, ...
by mirimir on Thursday August 06, 2015 @04:48PM
(#10019350)
I like the sticky-slime approach. I first read that in Snow Crash. Targets get glued to themselves and anything they touch. There's an enzyme that quickly degrades the adhesive.
Re:Why shooting to wound doesn't make sense scientifically, ...
by raceyT on Thursday August 06, 2015 @04:19PM
(#10019142)
It's mind boggling that a centuries old weapon is a supposition for any problem, let alone such a terribly serious one. It's likely that dog catchers are more advanced in their approach.