zz1
zz1 on Hacker News
Posted by
zz1 on Monday February 08, 2016 @05:44AM
from the eff.org dept.
Posted by
zz1 on Monday January 11, 2016 @08:06PM
from the archive.org dept.
The CCC built a distributed CDN, so nope, that wouldn't help: my video is loading from netcologne.de, for instance (in a 'video' element, which is appreciate, from my point of view).
> Just keeps spinning.
Sounds like what happens to me when opening the page. Did you try to click on 'Video' tab or on the 'Play' button? It started the video for me.
I use Tor for regular use. Could you provide more detailed instructions for #3? I would like to consider setting up this option.
> Pay developers millions of dollars internally then they release what they work on as open source code.
What do they release as open source code, apart from TextEdit? I am really surprised by your comparison since it seems to me that the two (bash, vim, top, netcat… and Apple's open source code) do not compare at all.
Except that isn't Sorrentino's last film. And both Youth and La grande bellezza are beautiful movies.
You could also catch BadUSB...
Which isn't bad: your method works against lexical analysis (which as Bill Binney said is terrible because it buries analysts under too much material), while this method is against the three hops policy.
Please, do not forget that encrypted e-mail should not be predictable: https://futureboy.us/pgp.html#GoodPractices
The UX is not the biggest issue, but rather the buggy library it is based on. There is an alternative:
https://jitsi.org/
You are right, but for that to happen, AOO should ship code, which is not doing at the moment, AFAIK.
In order to be easier to pwn!
Seeing who is building this project, reading their quotes, I see more reason for concern than for rejoice.
This whole T-agreements are way beyond madness.
Great example of the importance of diversity!
Good choice: I can second this opinion, since I was too under the impression that OTR was used.
But is still a close ally of the US when it comes to intelligence.
But certainly the water is filtered before reaching homes, considering it rests a long time in a open reservoir. So you could remove the dead algae. Still, they certainly have a "better dead" approach, wanting the reservoir to be a dead pool instead of a living ecosystem where they'd have to monitor what is growing and how dangerous it might be.
They have space, and they conceived this system, like many others, thinking of what was the easiest thing to do, disregarding a low-maintenance approach.
Well, there is a difference from "we do this" and "we have been mandated to do this", whatever the reason "to do this" might be.
I guess that explaining they were forced to cover the reservoir makes me appreciate the solution even more: given an order, they found an intelligent and efficient solution.