ziggzagg
ziggzagg on Hacker News
React et al are the future Angular 2.
> Base or "skeleton" application for Ruby on Rails 5.1 projects. Built to minimize the time spent writing boilerplate code and performing repetitive setup tasks.
Wasn't Rails 1.0 invented to solve this exact problem? A decade later and after 5 versions we are here?
I know this will get downvoted, but here I go anyway: Please stop reinventing the wheels. Just stick to one library/framework whatever crap they are. Why? Because your new shiny wheel will be as crap as the old one very soon.
I am myself refusing learning new tools in javascript. I think I have spent enough time learning enough of them. I have a selected set of them, and I turn down projects which fall out of that set. Less money, but better mental health.
My point is the web frontend target is such an obvious one here. Specially given the dart to javascript compiler history.
Posted by
ziggzagg on Saturday August 19, 2017 @05:18PM
from the ask-hn dept.
I've been developing web api and apps with Go for some years. My feeling about this can be summarized by repetitive questions that appear on /r/golang about how to build a web app in Go, what framework/library to use in Go to build a web app. The high frequency of the same question is a sign that something is not right about web dev in Go.Kotlin based web frameworks and libraries seem to be...
Why is that Flutter does not have a web target? Everything is nice and fast about it, it's a shame that after building a cross mobile apps, you'll app to start the web app from scratch using another platform.
Vue is heavily dominated by Chinese, there is a ton of MD implementations, but hard to judge. One solid MD implementation in vue is
https://vuetifyjs.com/ which is not Chinese.
We keep hearing that Hawking makes his concerning comments about subjects like AI, aliens and now national health insurance. He is a theoretical physicist.
When this test has a near 100% success rate, how does it help the patients? Can it really prevent cancer?
This is not about technology, this is about user war. Back in 2011, Google got seriously scared about Facebook growth. So they naively came up with this Google+ idea, which of course died and joined the long list of Google's embarrassing tries in the social networking space.
It is sad to see the negative effects of Facebook, on one side on users and stealing their privacy and data, and on the other side on giants like Google, who used to create cool projects like Gmail back when the internet was a cool breath.
2011: Google tries to compete with Facebook: Google+
2016: Google tries to compete with Telegram, Whatsapp and aton of other messenger: Allo
Mot google projects die organically, with a short life span. No need to keep bashing AMP like this.
Only the marketing part of this "side" project feel like more than a full project to me.