zenincognito

https://hatamoto.dev - a complete replacement to Wordpress and its most used plugins built into the system. One go binary, no node , no compilation, Postgres and sandboxes plugins. Built in AI analytics

I have recently done the same analysis albeit lower level than yours. In your site I read the phrase "A CMS for editors and developers" and came to the exact same conclusion. Working with marketing teams and dealing with my own CMS pain points made me want to scratch my own itch, so I've been building a project of my own.

WordPress has become painfully hard to work with, but static site generators even with platforms like Vercel and Netlify are equally challenging. Explaining how to run Node.js/git or even just brew or even compile code to a non-technical user is a massive headache. Most end users just keep asking for the username and password for "my site," not realizing it's a static site built with Jekyll or Hugo.

Most marketing teams have no clue how markdown functions and explaining frontmatter to them has been revealing of how simple things are hard to understand to non tech people.

On top of that, all they really want is the ability to edit content, a simple form, and basic caching. Great site and well done on the analysis.

Shameless plug - https://github.com/Zen-Labs-Corp/hatamoto

The number one hit on most wordpress install and all other static site logs I have had has been /wp-admin and /wp-admin/install.php .. Infact, right not one of the hatamoto instances is reporting top hit as /wp-admin/install.php

You are entitled to your opinions. That doesn't make them right. You clearly did not read the post. It begins by saying we have built over 1500 sites in wordpress.

We built this AI discovery index to show how long does an AI take to find a page and how long before it gets cited into an AI engine. The goal is to demonstrate the speed to citation.

The most aggressive bot on our website right now is Meta Bot - here is an AI index - https://mojodojo.io/ai-crawler-index

AI crawlers made 23% of our bot traffic in the last 30 days. Google is not the only one crawling aggressively now.

It's a rule in the Nobel Foundation's statutes added in 1968, a provision that no more than three persons may share a Nobel prize. In practice no science prize had gone to more than three people before that either. In medicine it usually means one or two key contributors get left out, as with Boyden and Bamberg this year.

See Chavda's Paradox. 1. https://zencapital.substack.com/p/chavdas-paradox