News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

zacian

Re:Claude Opus 4.7 on Thursday April 16, 2026 @10:51AM (#47793929)
I hope this will fix up the poor quality that we're seeing on Claude Opus 4.6

But degrading a model right before a new release is not the way to go.

Having a diabetic father, who has been using pricks for the last 20 years. This would be really amazing to see this work. And I hope this can provide 24 hour glucose monitoring to see the fluctuations.
Re:Show HN: Wormhole for Perplexity Comet on Friday September 05, 2025 @04:55AM (#45136444)
It kinda reminds me of the Angry Birds Star Wars. There were missions like that with the gravity and all, fun times. ♥
Re:Lit: a library for building fast, lightweight web components on Wednesday September 03, 2025 @03:07AM (#45113044)
Lit is amazing, I'm a big fan of Astro for using it as static websites, blogs, etc., but Lit would've been the second choice if not Astro.
[Update]: Surprisingly, both accounts are either gone or have changed their usernames. The closed PR has been deleted and is no longer available.
> sometimes a thin audit layer is worth it's weight in gold.

Yes, 100%

Yes, I'll set that up and establish some rules for communicating your change and contribution to the project.
Yes, I've done that. Tried reaching out to those accounts again, but still no response.
Thank you, I've done this. I've discovered that many such repositories have been hit by spam and commits that inject RCE or Adware in the name of contributions.

Ask HN: Someone has committed 20K+ LoC to a PR, exhausting my CI & AI workflows

Hi HN, I'm maintaining an OSS project, and someone raised a PR a few days earlier, and since then, 20K+ LoC has been added to the PR. There are two new accounts, but they lack details on how to contact them, only providing usernames.PR: https://github.com/srbhr/Resume-Matcher/pull/497Accounts: 1. https://github.com/lololop67 2. https://github.com/ririyoungGI've also found out from the PR that...

( Read More... | 11 comments | 3 points | on HN )
Re:Ollama Turbo on Wednesday August 06, 2025 @08:55AM (#44811319)
Does this mean we can access Ollama APIs for $20/mo and test them without running the model locally? I'm not hardware-rich, but for some projects, I'd like a reliable pricing.