yonixw

The ~66% genocide of your race in Europe is already over for at least 23h 59m 59s and 999ms!

You sick fucks! How dare you run from Europe!

https://knowyourmeme.com/photos/2855116-she-was-x-you-sick-f... (Your crazy comment deserve just this meme)

OH, we looking at ICC and ICJ? Then sure. But then, you will surely agree to never let a Palestine state to be? As long as Hamas is in control, as, after all, look at their warrants- such bigots:

https://www.icc-cpi.int/news/statement-icc-prosecutor-karim-...

If you want no Hamas, No Bibi, No apartheid (which the ICJ also said as minority opinion that its just security concerns - i.e. terror attacks) then -

I agree! I want peace! But... maybe - Hamas first? I mean, Israel tried to be first with Ehud Barak... then with Ehud Olmert...

And Be sure to @ me where you called Palestine a "state [that] is bigoted by nature!" You surely done it? Right? By your own standard?

EDIT: You said a lot more, but it's just the same arguments with no rebuttal to the LLM answer so I point you to it again.

Nice fanfic. Now explain how Israel has 2M Palestinians citizens and they are in every place, from medical to judicial (including supreme court) to political.

All of this just show young country with shaky economy that cannot help elderly and sick. Nothing changes. But because yout lenses are the same, you will never see it.

Your have 3 mistakes in describing Israel as "settler colonial apartheid" alone. I cannot help you. Maybe Wikis or LLMs will or [1] as a start.

I am only sad about HN level of discussion, and how smart people in tech leave their critical thinking, kicking it out the door when the "I-word" is in the article/comment.

[1] https://share.gemini.google/cF5oyWZID7UR

The commenter referenced 1947. And said from nowadays PERSPECTIVE about THAT time that it's a "bigoted state project". I just reminded them that the project got its population (50%+) from Jews that ran for their lives. So his NOWADAYS perspective about that time is crazy. As from the first moment, it was about protecting Jews.

The only other alternative at the time was the US, but with limited immigration after WW2, it was obvious it couldn't be the whole story.

If you have further disagreement, please explain why in the same sentence he wrote "bigoted state project" and 1947.

EDIT: you added "(explicitly colonial)" before Zionism. And I looked at your comment history... Your are deliberately misreading stuff... good luck out there. My last words to you are: At that time before WW2, this entire area was under the Ottomans, so making a government there for Jews (enclave) by BUYING land, is colonial, and not what you try to say which is: "Kill all natives, we are the superior race". Because who at that time thought he could overthrow the Ottomans? But you don't care.

LOL, imagine you saying that holocaust survivors (36%) and Arab countries refugees (27%) in 1947-1952+ cared about anything else other then who will protect Jews. Only the US and the Zionist did (on bought land pre-war btw, read a wiki please). But nowadays "they wanted a bigoted state"... what a joke. HN level is freefalling...

Exactly, this map misses the Sinai occupation and return.

This is the more correct version:

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Israeli_territorial_...

Very different story told here...

I guess, if you toss out core first-principles like "self defense", "stand your ground", sequence of events, etc. Which many do these days, and just decide based on vibes.

> Shooting the shooter? Are you suggesting that all of the tens of thousands of children killed in gaza were shooters?

Wat 0_o? Did you even read my comment?

Not that relevant here, as they try to attack Israel with that influence. Like Hamas that organize some protests in the EU [1] or Qatar's Al-Jazeera censoring anti-Hamas criticism from Gazans [2]. So it's more like "if they are attacked by that? why can't they use it themselves."

Like, shooting a gun is bad. But shooting the shooter? Not the same (thus, not "whataboutism" because you can't say "who care about other shooters in the scene - whataboutism!") .

[1] https://www.jpost.com/diaspora/article-894273

[2] https://themedialine.org/top-stories/is-al-jazeera-a-mouthpi...

In VB6 I just scrolled the autocomplete dropdown in the 2005 IDE to find what's possible + Some random answer from codeproject.com

The good times...

HN need community notes BAD.

> For your leveraged investments, pay yourself in refinanced cash when your investments appreciate and/or credit rates drop.

In other words: Gamble that (1) your investments appreciate, or (2) that you will find credit rates drop when convenient.

In 1 word: Gamble.

So, either you are rich and have spare money to gamble, which sure, might be beneficial against taxes. But you could also gamble against any other sector (stocks, housing, startups...)

Or, if you are not rich, just put it in the 401k (or eq).

It is really not clear at all from the timeline. Why attack Saudi oil refinery 2 days after Israel/US attacked you?

And don't bring Trump quotes when only convenient. You yourself don't believe his already existing statements. (Me too)

> After Israel attacked gasfields and Iran retaliated

That timeline is incorrect. Iran attacked nearby countries oil and gas since the 2nd day of the war. So, from the get go. (Not to mention closing the Strait of Hormuz, and attacking random oil tankers).

Israel/US started the War, Iran was the first to use oil/gas as a weapon.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timeline_of_the_2026_Iran_war

> Both are classified as civilians

Then say civilians. Don't claim what you can't provide. And DO provide context (like, was it still while the massacre was ongoing [1]). But all I can do is to suggest.

> Good job cherry-picking

Me cherry-picking: Taking the literally first entries, Array[0] and Array[1].

Also, you can't claim cherry-picking as invalid against gish-gallop. Since you can't enjoy the size argument only to retract items on the list after the smallest pushback.

Otherwise I can prove God. How? Every sentence in the Bible... Oh, you found some that are wrong? "Good job cherry-picking"!

And not to mention dozens of more problems with the list (no mentioning any IDF comments, no source for titles, etc.). This is just a bad list. Simple as.

> ICC is clearly investigating

Investigating != Judgment. But good, send them more. But please send them a list starting with items that might hold the smallest of scrutinies. And don't prove it by hinting at conspiracies just because Israel has a security censor. But all I can do is to suggest.

[1]: https://13tv.co.il/item/news/abroad/dynw9-903794689/

The wiki sources FROM YOUR LINKS, are suddenly not enough once they are against you?

Now now... one may mistakenly think you have some inconsistencies in your theory... and you out to revisit them first before demanding more..

Another "banger" comment that shows you did not read your sources links, here is one from the the wiki (Israeli Military Censor):

https://www.academia.edu/10481823/The_Israeli_paradox_The_mi...

Maybe your third comment will finally succeed...

The reason no one responds to this list is because it's just one big gish gallop

It's enough to see that you brought a link to the Israeli Military Censor to hint at a conspiracy, to understand who you're dealing with.

But even if you go into the list, you'll see at the top that those who were shot were in the middle of the battle, where Israeli forces were surprised, to the point of massacre alongside civilians. And there, it turns out, they didn't shoot to save themselves by the skin of their teeth, but simply wanted to kill journalists.

Also, a quick search shows that "Mohammad Jarghoun" ("מוחמד ג'רגון") was not a journalist at all, but a media worker, that according to the CPJ [1], during wartime he receives journalistic status. (Also not mentioned in AJ [2]. what a surprise...)

Another comment to the pantheon of "the most logical failures, in the fewest words". And then no one understands why the ICC will never consider such reports..

[1]: https://www.the7eye.org.il/501320

[2]: https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2023/10/10/at-least-six-pales...

> whatever way they can.

Except agreeing to a peace deal and state recognition... with Ehud Barak or Ehud Olmert. And Except letting their citizens vote for their own gov in Gaza for over 17 years...

I guess responding to Israeli expansionism has some great strategy I still don't grasp.

Am I missing something? How data centers in US/EU evaporating water thousand of miles from Iran affect it? Does it disturb the rain cycle in Iran or something?

LOL

Next one: Cloudflare has an edge in Israel. And has workers who were in Unit8200 before 1991 (per linkedin) and ISRALIES. Who uses Cloudflare? MANY MEDICAL ORGS. Also, Cloudflare is just like MITM (CDN SSL termination). So does ISRAEL SPIES read all your MEDICAL data?

> "To think otherwise is completely naïve" (real qoute from the article btw = no proof)

What a sham article. Trump's TruthSocial level. But hey, most upvoted today (440+ points). And no point on reporting to mods also, I just get copy paste reply.

This is not written in the article. Can you give a source? Since based on linkedin he was not in the army since 1991....

(And I mean any source for any of your assumptions...)

My guess is the 2-level separation. You WILL need to make some part in your system LGPL by using "Sidequest.js" tightly, but then expose very simple APIs (like /start /status etc..) that will stop the LGPL from "infecting" other parts, as they can replace the "linking" with anything that will support those simple APIs.

Which is a good way to get improvements other are doing that relate to your source code through LGPL's source exposing, while not forcing it everywhere (GPL case). Especially, for backend libs.

And since AGPL will essentially make it non viable for SaaS (as network separation won't do), LGPL is what left.

Layman here also, but I think you are correct about GPL and LGPL (this case), but not for AGPL which adds a requirement that: "... If your software can interact with users remotely through a computer network, you should also make sure that it provides a way for users to get its source"

https://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.html#AGPLv3ServerAsUser

This. The article suggestion will make parsers need lookahead support instead of simple state machine.

Is "key1" array of ["value1", "key2"] ? or string "value1"? We can't now until we find ':'.

You will never catch me giving my AWS keys to AI agents. I don't need that stress.

> "Sorry Dave", I have made a recommended deployment to your 1 page blog app. It will contain CDN, WAF, 3 Load Balancers and a cross region S3 backup. My cost analysis says you will be billed 200K$ next month.

Ask it "What is the length of the response to this question"