yihsiu

Agree with this rhetorical question. What mlboss said should just be "automated company" not necessary a tech company.

With that definition, it's also unreasonable to me that 100 years ago, there wasn't any tech company

I actually prefer the way it is. When there are too many links around, I tend to do some DFS-like reading and it ends up anxiety and tons of tabs. Things get worst when there're loops.

taxed properly and the fund being used properly, which might be just as hard as Facebook and Google only caring about social good.

Is it just me? I can't make any operations, and tetrominoes did not drop from center (horizontally), but kind of from random position

Do (almost) nothing directly. But it may facilitate similar things in other countries/regions. It may stimulate, and the experience can also help executing policies. New technologies or methods can also be developed first. So I could be more meaningful than it looks like.

wondering the same thing... it also surprised me that 89% employee take the survey and seemed caring about the vision so much

Even if Google has the highest medium/average salary (which is so not true), still not necessarily means other companies won't pay much higher to an individual. The facts that so many "former Google employees" out there and people left Google in like 4 years on average also hint it. As many people already indicated, even not FAANG, many smaller companies are generous.

I'm not sure about this. At least for the same-sex marriage, seems that majority in US approves it in recent years. I don't think a regulation can or should make that kind of change while like 80% people don't agree with it.