yarri
> if slowing this down were possible
Why is embedded alignment evaluation not possible?
I agree with Dario, this did work globally in banking and did encourage a race to the top. Didn’t prevent the GFC but also we did survive the GFC.
I saw Woz on Northbound 280 “driving” his cherry red Model S, using FSD. He was looking down at the screen the whole time I watched him. Swear he had ssh’d into it.
[0] https://cloud.google.com/billing/docs/how-to/disable-billing...
https://github.com/tokyo-digitaltwin/roadmap_v1.0/blob/main/...
Would appreciate the collective energy being spent instead towards adding to amor refining Garry’s request.
## How can we fit so much more compute on the silicon?
The NVIDIA H200 has 989 TFLOPS of FP16/BF16 compute without sparsity. This is state-of-the-art (more than even Google’s new Trillium chip), and the GB200 launching in 2025 has only 25% more compute (1,250 TFLOPS per die).
Since the vast majority of a GPU’s area is devoted to programmability, specializing on transformers lets you fit far more compute. You can prove this to yourself from first principles:
It takes 10,000 transistors to build a single FP16/BF16/FP8 multiply-add circuit, the building block for all matrix math. The H100 SXM has 528 tensor cores, and each has $4 \times 8 \times 16$ FMA circuits. Multiplying tells us the H100 has 2.7 billion transistors dedicated to tensor cores.
*But an H100 has 80 billion transistors! This means only 3.3% of the transistors on an H100 GPU are used for matrix multiplication!*
This is a deliberate design decision by NVIDIA and other flexible AI chips. If you want to support all kinds of models (CNNs, LSTMs, SSMs, and others), you can’t do much better than this.
By only running transformers, we can fit way more more FLOPS on our chip, without resorting to lower precisions or sparsity.
## Isn’t memory bandwidth the bottleneck on inference?
For modern models like Llama-3, no!
Would the inverse of these punitive solutions, ie., encouraging carpool / ridesharing, not also work? It always amazes me how relatively unutilized the HOV lanes are.
> the problems with your flow are clearly posting calls to actions on the page Sigh, agreed. I'd like to move away from a wizard-based flow and try either a) using a calendar to drag & drop the schedule, or b) create a WYSIWYG "signup page builder" flow.
>I’d just ask for where is the ultimate destination, maybe a date and a list of emails.
So try to get quicker to the step where a signup page is shared with users, right?
> If I have time, I’ll play around with this on my phone later. Thanks!
Ironically, she works at Redpoint VC, but had trouble attracting developers to her idea. I built the MVP, conducting UserTesting.com focus groups to gather feedback from a busy, educated “soccer mom” demographic and iterated on a “wizard based” signup flow. Users reported it being better than the current email / spreadsheet / shared calendar approach they use now, some interest in paying for the service on a subscription basis. Key request was a native mobile app version, and, confusingly, a Craig's List like rideshare social matching service.
MVP is built on Parse.com / Backbone / Bootstrap, waiting for the right time to build out an iOS app; likely the start of a new school year.
Obviously the growth opportunities are in service-based, market-making transportation providers like Uber, BlaBlaCar/Carpooling.com, whereas this is more of a scheduling app with a long history of similar but failed approaches (as a quick search of ‘carpool’ on HN will show!)
Still, I like the feeling that I'm helping make other people's lives easier.
Feedback & ideas for good mobile app design most welcome!
[0] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=9238839 [1] http://blog.semiconductors.org/blog/what-end-use-application...
[0] http://venturebeat.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/xlarge_YC-...
- Would love the ability to save a collection of favorites, maybe add folders or tagging?
- I often get asked to create list of recommended craft beers and so would like the ability to share these lists easily
- Your data will be sparse to start with, but I'd be interested in knowing how many other users put beers into their favorites (I find the BeerAdvocate listings a bit tedious to wade through...)
- Not sure you want to, but the professional brewers I speak to are interested in a lower-cost alternative to Untappd [0] and you might be able to build a business here?
- Maybe this is an East Coast US thing, but there's a growing trend to pair beers with cheese [1]; maybe that's too specific a request but allowing used to add notes to the beers (meta data beyond BeerAdvocate) might be useful
Good luck!
[0] https://untappd.com/business [1] http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/02/25/beer-cheese-pairing...
I want to change the industry, and make a dent in the misogyny and cynicism, but I think the male bias shown here of creating a platformer with a girl hero (antihero?) is speculative. Boys play platformers. My daughter is fine with puzzle games. And dragons. Really cute dragons.
For what it's worth, the game design I worked on put the girl hero as the object of affection of boy enemies and monster boss characters, team up with other girls the thwart the advances of male characters. Misandristic, basically. Which doesn't seem like the best way to make a dent!
Warning: mkdir(): No space left on device in /home/tam/Dropbox/Webserver/allthefavicons/htdocs/classes/allthefavicons.class.php on line 19 Warning: mkdir(): No such file or directory in /home/tam/Dropbox/Webserver/allthefavicons/htdocs/classes/allthefavicons.class.php on line 20