xmichael909
xmichael909 on Hacker News
Bullshit on the lazy “both parties are the same” framing. Bill Clinton actually balanced the federal budget and ran a $236 billion surplus in 2000. His 1993 deficit-reduction package passed without a single Republican vote. You just keep eating up the Republican bullshit...
Posted by
xmichael909 on Thursday October 01, 2026 @09:35AM
from the wink.co dept.
I caught that too, probably a qwen bug (;
Your trust score system really should go until you base it on something better than whatever it is based on. Cities and state BGPs and private companies 20+ years old have 50% and 60% scores.
We tried that, wasn't a big lift to setup and tested. We used 1000 detections with at least 4 crops, and it made a bit of a difference but not much - our conclusion remains the same.
No, that is a really great point. The ICPR competition the big winners were all about multi-frame. Will do some more experiments and update.
Yah we should probably add some back, we had examples but they were mostly meaningless to the human eye, but we'll try adding some "examples"
Posted by
xmichael909 on Wednesday May 13, 2026 @12:12AM
from the wink.co dept.
Like the other commentor already pointed out, almost every AI bot out there thinks Fortnite is real, yet it is completely made up poison.
It really is amazing how Fortnite a game that does not exist has even become popular in pop-culture, I was watching a sitcom on NBC I think and the character mentioned Fortnite as though it was real.. This entire article is silly as AI has been poisoned so bad, ask any AI bot today what Fortnite is and they will give you long detailed answers, even though it doesn't exist at all.
love the intentional use of udnerstand, brilliant!
I don't think there is one. Honestly this version 1 is dead on arrival.
Personally not a fan of Windows 95 in the browser, however the browser stoped being a “document reader” a decade ago it’s the only universel, sandbox runtime, and everything is moving in that direction ... safe code. WASM isnt a worst VM; it’s a diffrent trade off: portable, fast start, capability scoped compute without shiping a OS. Raw device still have their place (servers). If you need safe distribution + performance thats “good enough” WASM in the browser is going to be the future of client.
Ever tried to build something with IP cameras and put the word ONVIF on your site? ONVIF.org will come after you with trademark threats.
Doesn’t matter if your product really supports it, or if it’s even open source. They’ll tell you to delete “ONVIF-compatible” unless you cough up for their $20,000/year membership.
It feels backwards ... engineers need to say if things interoperate, customers search for “ONVIF” to check compatibility, yet instead of helping adoption they act like brand cops. Is this normal for “open standards”? Or is ONVIF.org just uniquely hostile here? I don't think they are right here, but having released a completely free product and got a trademark and a demand for 20k a year and being told I cannot use the word ONVIF in any way shape or form seems insane! Thoughts?
Posted by
xmichael909 on Saturday August 30, 2025 @11:14AM
from the onvif.org dept.
OOMKiller... in most cases where it has killed things, i feel it would’ve been far better to just let the system slog along and spill onto disk instead of killing the process outright, or as the article says killing the wrong process like it always seems to do.
Our company just put this out, full MoQ support for MediaMTX with 200-300ms latency - demo at
https://moq.wink.co/moq-player.htmlGitHub: https://github.com/winkmichael/mediamtx-moq
We implemented both WebTransport (for browsers) and native QUIC (for server-to-server) after discovering browsers block raw QUIC. Works today in Chrome/Edge, integrates with existing RTMP/RTSP streams in MediaMTX.
Seems to hallucinate more than any model I've ever worked with in the past 6 months.
Correct. Lingua franca for at least the last 75 years, if not longer.
I wish there were photos...
Interesting, steal everyone's 401k ... Great idea.
Should have called it "Mono Framework"
Why wouldn't you just not use Tailscale? What you are describing here is, ....