workthrowaway
but... that's not a python problem.
every time people say they are having a hard time installing a python module, it's almost always a non-pure python module. it has an extension in c or c++. if that tells us anything, it's that mixing c and c++ makes software hard to install...
a fairer comparison with go here is with a go package that has extensions or bindings written in another language.
plus this: pair programming has only been studied / proven to work in a teaching environment, where one student is literally teaching the other and bringing them up to speed.
i don't know of any study that proves that it works in a professional setting with experienced people having more or less the same background, working on the same task
if there is any study, i would like to read it.
same! but i finished it anyway. it was during my speed-reading / audiobook transition. i have now become a normal reader again :)
to your point though, in retrospect, i think it all depends on when in your life/career you read a recommended book. seems to me that by the time you got to how to win friends, you have already read a lot and learned most of the "obvious" things in the book.
also, sqlalchemy is an over-engineered system imo. i only go for it when i have no other choices. otherwise i use a database client directly.
i, unlike GP, do not get a smile on my face when i read ruby code full of implicit tricks. even when i understand some of them, it is still annoying.
why don't people just write clear, explicit, maintainable code instead of trying to be clever. i am sure method_missing could be implemented in python using various tricks but nobody, afaik, is doing that.
OMG not familiar with the person being talked about but "going home" resonates with me. leonard cohen wrote some powerful songs in his old age and "going home" is one of them.
same. i think it is a superb idea for ubuntu here. hopefully there are tools like this for other OS distros as well.
that's very selective. here's a few more: digg, fark, slashdot
not how it works for me! i have friends on fb that i haven't talked to or seen since high school. i don't use fb proper but it's good to know that it remembers everyone so i don't have to. i guess it goes the other around as well.
btw did you know that grep (as in the unix tool) is in the dictionary? it even says it comes from the operating system.
this is recent but in design, i read that companies can now own branding colors and themes.
> This kind of code change happens all the time.
we have all been there.
i think she knew she wasn't following proper procedure. even if it's done "all the time".
i, honestly, want to know why you think otherwise. what she did is wrong.
but assuming she didn't know and that's what the "by the book" process at Google truly is... that's even more concerning
that's an interesting anecdote. it was the opposite experience for me. friends and i had yahoo and hotmail emails back then but no one cared about sending emails or replying to them.
yahoo messenger and msn messenger were the reason those were created. i can't recall anyone stressing about it because the person you'd be messaging was with you most of the time...
love this :)
oh come on. the examples were good so far...
why would i need an app to monitor my sleep if i don't have any sleep disorder or similar? i am putting such app in the "need for attention" category.
oh wow! really?! very interesting
what worries me is the sampling itself. or how diverse the sample is. using VR users data to draw any conclusion is misrepresenting the larger population. now if we are all into VR or use it, this might be different...
wow, this is so intriguing. i like this analogy even if i don't know how accurate it is.
we indeed have things that we forget (running out of space?) and things that take time to remember (disk latency).
i think it's more because it does not really matter for most people. not because it's too difficult.
there are companies today that can put the resources to the task. i am just going to assume that the priorities are elsewhere.