News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

wikiwawa

Yes, in this case, probably the peak.
Re:E.U.’s Biggest Economies Ban Boeing Max 8 Jets on Tuesday March 12, 2019 @04:39PM (#19372775)
Good point, I was wondering why I was off orders of magnitude.
Re:E.U.’s Biggest Economies Ban Boeing Max 8 Jets on Tuesday March 12, 2019 @03:47PM (#19372185)
The mean of a Beta Distribution (2, 348) (https://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=beta+distribution+(2,+...) is roughly half a percent, much higher than the 1 in 11 million across all flights (https://www.quora.com/What-is-the-probability-for-an-airplan...).

(You can pretty much always make statistical inference, with uncertainty going up with the lack of data)

Note that the regression is on the differences, y_t - y_t-1 not the levels, just y_t.

So the argument is more subtle, that the "change" in AirBnB share is correlated with changes in rents. So level effects such as being a nice neighborhood are accounted for.

Having said that, a large change in AirBnB share is probably still related to unobservables related to factors that would increase rent. E.g changes in hipness of a neighborhood unaccounted for by changes in demographics. Therefore the $616M figure is biased upwards, though I bet in reality still a large number.

Re:Training a neural net to generate British placenames on Friday July 21, 2017 @02:10PM (#14822614)
Not to be a downer but put this one under the category of "it's not AI if a character based ngram model can do it".

But fun regardless of the hype-y AI title.

Re:Why Law Firm Rankings Are Useless on Thursday September 15, 2016 @02:45PM (#12508684)
I understand sarcasm, that's for sure.

As a matter develops, parties tend to drop out if they think that their chances have declined beyond some threshold. But if they continue, or more likely, their legal representation suggests they continue, it implies that they think they have a good chance of success.

Of course, you can get irrational litigants but most of the time, if it goes to judgement, both parties think they have a high chance of success. Otherwise they would have bailed.

Re:Why Law Firm Rankings Are Useless on Thursday September 15, 2016 @02:23PM (#12508509)
A large part of statistics is devoted to making valid inference from noisy samples, largely by making sensible assumptions. Even in your example, it is common practice to assess a surgeon on outcomes of surgery, even though a lot of a surgeon's work does not lead to surgery.

We aren't claiming to assess the wide practice of law, just litigation. We do Litigation Analytics.

Re:The Big Mac Index on Thursday July 16, 2015 @12:06PM (#9898052)