whyhellothere
'The Loving Trap' (2011) is a good place to start exploring this visionaries ground breaking work...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x1bX3F7uTrg
Why is this on hacker news?
I'm not sure about the 1 month trial thing (I think your demo is strong enough that people will understand what your apps about). I get that you want people using it, then when they can't live without hit them up for some money, but you may be cutting your market in half as i'm sure there are a lot of people who travel for 2 weeks who would use your app for that period of time.
As for day-trippers, won't they just use facebook or flickr? I thought your app was better for proper journeys as you can include elements other than photos (google maps etc).
One last thought: My older relatives always used to make physical scrap books of their travels (with photos / tickets / maps etc) in them. A possible extra/alternative source of income could be to sell the physical version of their online "story" (again not necessarily for them to keep, but to give to other relatives)
I have travelled a lot in the past and this would have been great for keeping people up to date (especially facebookless elderly relatives).
With this in mind, I think you should do away with the free option and up your premium price.
Edit: younger backpackers go travelling for long periods of time, their parents would think nothing of shelling out $5 /month to be kept in the loop!
I don't disagree that foreign students bring a lot to this country, and that the handling of this thing by the government was extremely poor (2), but you're conflating two different issues in order to make a point about the Daily Mail.
It seems like you're guilty of the same simplistic arguments.
(1) http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/education-19419395
(2) http://www.guardian.co.uk/education/2012/aug/30/london-metro...
In this case though, from an accessibility point of view there are a few issues with the use of a link tag rather than the standard form 'input submit' or 'button'.
Problems include:
- It goes against user expectations of how the form functions
- User would not be able to submit the form while focus is on one of the inputs (although this could be remedied with more js)
- User would have to realise that this form does not have a standard submit button and realise that the link tag is the submit button (difficult for screen readers because there are no alt tags).
There is also an issue with usability for the few who don't have js enabled, as they will not be able to submit this form.
For personal sites it really comes down to your preferences. Personally I would prefer that everyone was able to comment, however if it stops you having to wade through thousands of spam messages every day I can see the point of using it.
(this is an honest question, while I am trying to make a point, I would actually like to hear other peoples opinions)
Something always seems off about the quality of their articles compared to the other (above average) content that usually makes its way to the front page.
1. http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2012/09/bush-obama-war-on-t...